These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19302271)

  • 21. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18155179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diazepam impairs temporal dynamics of visual attention.
    Boucart M; Waucquier N; Michael GA; Libersa C
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Feb; 15(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 17295590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing.
    Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inhibition or facilitation of return: Does chromatic component count?
    do Canto-Pereira LH; Paramei GV; Morya E; Ranvaud RD
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):489-93. PubMed ID: 16961985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution.
    Yeshurun Y
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1375-87. PubMed ID: 15066397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Your divided attention, please! The maintenance of multiple attentional control sets over distinct regions in space.
    Adamo M; Pun C; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):295-303. PubMed ID: 17719570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.
    Danziger S; Rafal R
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 19121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incidental learning of secondary attentional cueing.
    Navon D; Kasten R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):459-75. PubMed ID: 17927945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.
    Pratt J; Arnott SR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 17490594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 20121291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of prime-target spatial separation and attentional deployment on masked repetition priming.
    Marzouki Y; Meeter M; Grainger J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1393-400. PubMed ID: 18927022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial attention and audiovisual interactions in apparent motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):927-37. PubMed ID: 17683238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 19750791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
    Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The attentional dynamics of masked detection.
    Smith PL; Wolfgang BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):119-36. PubMed ID: 14769072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial cueing deficits in dyslexia reflect generalised difficulties with attentional selection.
    Roach NW; Hogben JH
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 18068752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Going rogue in the spatial cuing paradigm: high spatial validity is insufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention.
    Davis GJ; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1192-201. PubMed ID: 22390290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.