These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19302378)
21. A study of correlation of hand and foot dimensions for personal identification in mass disasters. Kanchan T; Krishan K; Sharma A; Menezes RG Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jun; 199(1-3):112.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20382487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sexual dimorphism in the tarsal bones: implications for sex determination. Harris SM; Case DT J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 22211822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Osteometric analysis for sexing of modern sternum - an autopsy study from South India. Chandrakanth HV; Kanchan T; Krishan K Leg Med (Tokyo); 2014 Nov; 16(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 25127732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The role of the anterior border of the hip bone in sexual dimorphism: a morphometric study in the North Indian population. Sachdeva K; Singla RK; Kalsey G Med Sci Law; 2011 Oct; 51(4):208-14. PubMed ID: 22021590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sexual dimorphism of the humerus in contemporary Cretans--a population-specific study and a review of the literature*. Kranioti EF; Michalodimitrakis M J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):996-1000. PubMed ID: 19627412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An osteometric study of northern Indian populations for sexual dimorphism in craniofacial region. Saini V; Srivastava R; Rai RK; Shamal SN; Singh TB; Tripathi SK J Forensic Sci; 2011 May; 56(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 21361935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sex determination from the radius and ulna in a modern South African sample. Barrier IL; L'Abbé EN Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):85.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18511225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sexing of human hip bones of Indian origin by discriminant function analysis. Dixit SG; Kakar S; Agarwal S; Choudhry R J Forensic Leg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(7):429-35. PubMed ID: 17720595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Forensic tool for sex prediction- hand dimensions. Gupta R; Nayyar AK; Gupta MK; Bhagat OL Afr Health Sci; 2022 Dec; 22(4):408-412. PubMed ID: 37092092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation of sex from the upper limb measurements of Sudanese adults. Ahmed AA J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1041-7. PubMed ID: 24237816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sexual dimorphism of acetabulum-pubis index in South-Indian population. Nagesh KR; Kanchan T; Bastia BK Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Nov; 9(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 17616420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sex estimation from foramen magnum dimensions in an Indian population. Raghavendra Babu YP; Kanchan T; Attiku Y; Dixit PN; Kotian MS J Forensic Leg Med; 2012 Apr; 19(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 22391003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sex determination using the scapula in medieval skeletons from East Anatolia. Ozer I; Katayama K; Sağir M; Güleç E Coll Antropol; 2006 Jun; 30(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 16848161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validity of the mandibular canine index (MCI) in sex prediction: Reassessment in an Indian sample. Acharya AB; Angadi PV; Prabhu S; Nagnur S Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan; 204(1-3):207.e1-4. PubMed ID: 20846802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks. Steyn M; Işcan MY Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):86.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18554832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. Robinson MS; Bidmos MA Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra--A test of the method. Marlow EJ; Pastor RF J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 20735699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of sex from index and ring finger in a North Indian population. Krishan K; Kanchan T; Asha N; Kaur S; Chatterjee PM; Singh B J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Jul; 20(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 23756517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Why digit ratio (2D:4D) is inappropriate for sex determination in medicolegal investigations. Voracek M Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Mar; 185(1-3):e29-30. PubMed ID: 19200670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination. Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]