These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19302674)
1. Contralateral comparison of wavefront-guided LASIK surgery with iris recognition versus without iris recognition using the MEL80 Excimer laser system. Wu F; Yang Y; Dougherty PJ Clin Exp Optom; 2009 May; 92(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 19302674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative clinical study of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with versus without iris recognition for myopia or myopic astigmatism]. Wang WQ; Zhang JS; Zhao XJ Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 47(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 22321504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison. Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia. Wu J; Zhong X; Yang B; Wang Z; Yu K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1059-65. PubMed ID: 23809945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes. Kim J; Choi SH; Lim DH; Yang CM; Yoon GJ; Chung TY J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 31196580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration. Zhang J; Zhou YH; Wang NL; Li R Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan; 121(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18272040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations. El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study. He L; Liu A; Manche EE Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of iris recognition system for wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism. Ghosh S; Couper TA; Lamoureux E; Jhanji V; Taylor HR; Vajpayee RB J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 18242443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity between wavefront-guided and aspheric LASIK for myopia. Goyal JL; Garg A; Arora R; Jain P; Goel Y J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):777-84. PubMed ID: 25375851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia in virgin eyes. Jain AK; Malhotra C; Pasari A; Kumar P; Moshirfar M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1302-1311. PubMed ID: 27697248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors. Alió JL; Montés-Mico R Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16378639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 2 wavefront-guided excimer lasers for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results. Yu CQ; Manche EE J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 24581773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare conventional and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. D'Arcy F; Kirwan C; Qasem Q; O'Keefe M Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 20074288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study. Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of iris registration on outcomes of FEMTOLASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Ghoreishi M; Beni ZN; Beni AN; Kianersi F Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 38(5):2077-2087. PubMed ID: 28875250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Matsumura K; Komatsu M Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1178-86.e1. PubMed ID: 22365084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Changes of ocular aberration after wavefront-guided aspherical LASIK for myopia]. Liu S; Sun H; Nie X; Mai Z; Ma N; Xin B; Sun H Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 50(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24709130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]