245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19302737)
1. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.
Peng H; Liu W; Jiang J; Du H
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 37641051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Morphological observation of cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Chen XD; Shi HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 19035137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.
Kliemann LM; Silva M; Reinheimer M; Rivoire WA; Capp E; Dos Reis R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 22948133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive factors for residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for CIN III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Tseng JJ; Ho ES
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 11063658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
