BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19302739)

  • 1. Clinical assessment for three routes of hysterectomy.
    Zhu L; Lang JH; Liu CY; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Fan R
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 19302739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical study on different operation procedure for hysterectomy].
    Huang XY; Fang SH; Wang MZ; Liu ZC; Zhang SY; Chen QB
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 40(10):652-5. PubMed ID: 16277891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Jaturasrivilai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 17596034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.
    Shiota M; Kotani Y; Umemoto M; Tobiume T; Shimaoka M; Hoshiai H
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Nov; 4(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 22776300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of different surgical approaches on quality of life and cost-consequence].
    Leng JH; Lang JH; Li HJ; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Zhu L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 15196413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective and comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).
    Kulvanitchaiyanunt A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Jul; 87(7):745-9. PubMed ID: 15521227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges.
    Gemignani ML; Curtin JP; Zelmanovich J; Patel DA; Venkatraman E; Barakat RR
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10094872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Four surgical patterns of hysterectomy for uterine without prolapsis: a clinical study].
    Hua K; Lin J; Liu X; Feng W; Jiang H; Fang F; Hu C; Zhang J; Xu C
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 82(23):1599-603. PubMed ID: 12667364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].
    Tan XJ; Lang JH; Shen K; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Leng JH; Zhu L
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 25(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 12974083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kongwattanakul K; Khampitak K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 22133703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.
    Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: experience in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh.
    Jahan S; Das TR; Mahmud N; Mondol SK; Habib SH; Saha S; Yasmin S; Joarder M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011; 31(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 21417652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical comparison of transvaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy].
    Bai WP; Li LP; Feng MY; Wang XH; Qin XQ; Li KM; Zhou YF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 40(10):656-8. PubMed ID: 16277892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.
    Ark C; Güngördük K; Celebi I; Celikkol O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19184075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
    Muzii L; Basile S; Zupi E; Marconi D; Zullo MA; Manci N; Bellati F; Angioli R; Benedetti Panici P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 17848323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is previous cesarean section a risk for incidental cystotomy at the time of hysterectomy? A case-controlled study.
    Rooney CM; Crawford AT; Vassallo BJ; Kleeman SD; Karram MM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 193(6):2041-4. PubMed ID: 16325612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.