BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19303424)

  • 1. Attentional guidance relies on a winner-take-all mechanism.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1522-31. PubMed ID: 19303424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):640-54. PubMed ID: 19309292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images.
    Peters RJ; Iyer A; Itti L; Koch C
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2397-416. PubMed ID: 15935435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal feature integration in visual search.
    Vincent BT; Baddeley RJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):15.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks.
    Reardon KM; Kelly JG; Matthews N
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):691-701. PubMed ID: 19200437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements.
    Motter BC; Simoni DA
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2382-93. PubMed ID: 18722398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.
    Nuthmann A; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):20. PubMed ID: 20884595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual search without attentional displacement.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention and the detection of masked radial frequency patterns: Data and model.
    Smith PL; Lee YE; Wolfgang BJ; Ratcliff R
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1363-77. PubMed ID: 18538812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation.
    Yeshurun Y; Carrasco M
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jun; 3(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 10816320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial selection and target identification are separable processes in visual search.
    Ghorashi S; Enns JT; Klein RM; Di Lollo V
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):7.1-12. PubMed ID: 20377284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based attention and the suppression of non-relevant object features.
    Wegener D; Ehn F; Aurich MK; Galashan FO; Kreiter AK
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(27):2696-707. PubMed ID: 18824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fixation and saliency during search of natural scenes: the case of visual agnosia.
    Foulsham T; Barton JJ; Kingstone A; Dewhurst R; Underwood G
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1994-2003. PubMed ID: 19428433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.