These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19303425)

  • 1. Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception.
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19303425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs).
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):894-904. PubMed ID: 17666030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations to the detection of deception: true and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure.
    Allen JJ; Mertens R
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):473-90. PubMed ID: 18633842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios.
    Mertens R; Allen JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 17995914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
    Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
    Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N200 and P300 as orthogonal and integrable indicators of distinct awareness and recognition processes in memory detection.
    Hu X; Pornpattananangkul N; Rosenfeld JP
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):454-64. PubMed ID: 23317115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of intention to conceal in the P300-based concealed information test.
    Kubo K; Nittono H
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 19499325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
    Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-resolution ERP mapping of cortical activation related to implicit object-location memory.
    Murphy JS; Wynne CE; O'Rourke EM; Commins S; Roche RA
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 19683556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
    Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
    Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel, ERP-based, concealed information detection: Combining recognition-based and feedback-evoked ERPs.
    Sai L; Lin X; Rosenfeld JP; Sang B; Hu X; Fu G
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Feb; 114():13-22. PubMed ID: 26638760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eyewitness identification accuracy: a comparison of adults with and those without intellectual disabilities.
    Ericson K; Isaacs B
    Ment Retard; 2003 Jun; 41(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 12737610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.