171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19303834)
1. Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
Durani P; McGrouther DA; Ferguson MW
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Jun; 62(6):713-20. PubMed ID: 19303834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring.
Brown BC; Moss TP; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 19501559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Median sternotomy scar assessment.
Jina H; Simcock J
N Z Med J; 2011 Nov; 124(1346):57-62. PubMed ID: 22143853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales.
van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
J Burn Care Res; 2012; 33(2):e79-87. PubMed ID: 22249102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a porcine incisional wound model and novel scarring scales.
Singer AJ; McClain SA
Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 16939579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
Idriss N; Maibach HI
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scar assessment: current problems and future solutions.
Powers PS; Sarkar S; Goldgof DB; Cruse CW; Tsap LV
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1999; 20(1 Pt 1):54-60; discussion 53. PubMed ID: 9934638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consequences of excessive scar formation: dealing with the problem and aiming for the future.
Greenhalgh DG
Wound Repair Regen; 2007; 15 Suppl 1():S2-5. PubMed ID: 17727463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of self-reported scales assessing burn contractures reveals the need for a new tool to measure contracture outcomes.
Ehanire T; Vissoci JR; Slaughter K; Coêlho R; Bond J; Rodrigues C; Pietrobon R; Levinson H
Wound Repair Regen; 2013; 21(4):520-9. PubMed ID: 23758108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars.
Bloemen MC; van Gerven MS; van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):706-15. PubMed ID: 21216493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ECCA grading scale: an original validated acne scar grading scale for clinical practice in dermatology.
Dreno B; Khammari A; Orain N; Noray C; Mérial-Kieny C; Méry S; Nocera T
Dermatology; 2007; 214(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17191047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
Roques C; Teot L
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated VSS-based Burn Scar Assessment using Combined Texture and Color Features of Digital Images in Error-Correcting Output Coding.
Pham TD; Karlsson M; Andersson CM; Mirdell R; Sjoberg F
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16744. PubMed ID: 29196632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining the Independent Risk Factors for Worse SCAR-Q Scores and Future Scar Revision Surgery.
Ziolkowski NI; Behman R; Klassen AF; Fish JS; Mundy LR; She RW; Forrest CR; Hollenbeck S; Arriagada C; Greenhalgh D; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):203-212. PubMed ID: 34076625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective scar assessment--a new method using standardized digital imaging and spectral modelling.
Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
Burns; 2011 Feb; 37(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 20510521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
