These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19303834)

  • 1. Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
    Durani P; McGrouther DA; Ferguson MW
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Jun; 62(6):713-20. PubMed ID: 19303834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring.
    Brown BC; Moss TP; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 19501559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Median sternotomy scar assessment.
    Jina H; Simcock J
    N Z Med J; 2011 Nov; 124(1346):57-62. PubMed ID: 22143853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales.
    van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    J Burn Care Res; 2012; 33(2):e79-87. PubMed ID: 22249102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a porcine incisional wound model and novel scarring scales.
    Singer AJ; McClain SA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 16939579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
    Idriss N; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scar assessment: current problems and future solutions.
    Powers PS; Sarkar S; Goldgof DB; Cruse CW; Tsap LV
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1999; 20(1 Pt 1):54-60; discussion 53. PubMed ID: 9934638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consequences of excessive scar formation: dealing with the problem and aiming for the future.
    Greenhalgh DG
    Wound Repair Regen; 2007; 15 Suppl 1():S2-5. PubMed ID: 17727463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of self-reported scales assessing burn contractures reveals the need for a new tool to measure contracture outcomes.
    Ehanire T; Vissoci JR; Slaughter K; Coêlho R; Bond J; Rodrigues C; Pietrobon R; Levinson H
    Wound Repair Regen; 2013; 21(4):520-9. PubMed ID: 23758108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
    Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars.
    Bloemen MC; van Gerven MS; van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):706-15. PubMed ID: 21216493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ECCA grading scale: an original validated acne scar grading scale for clinical practice in dermatology.
    Dreno B; Khammari A; Orain N; Noray C; Mérial-Kieny C; Méry S; Nocera T
    Dermatology; 2007; 214(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17191047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
    Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
    J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated VSS-based Burn Scar Assessment using Combined Texture and Color Features of Digital Images in Error-Correcting Output Coding.
    Pham TD; Karlsson M; Andersson CM; Mirdell R; Sjoberg F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16744. PubMed ID: 29196632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the Independent Risk Factors for Worse SCAR-Q Scores and Future Scar Revision Surgery.
    Ziolkowski NI; Behman R; Klassen AF; Fish JS; Mundy LR; She RW; Forrest CR; Hollenbeck S; Arriagada C; Greenhalgh D; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):203-212. PubMed ID: 34076625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective scar assessment--a new method using standardized digital imaging and spectral modelling.
    Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
    Burns; 2011 Feb; 37(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 20510521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.