These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304040)

  • 1. Continuous versus discontinuous distraction: evaluation of bone regenerate following various rhythms of distraction.
    Djasim UM; Wolvius EB; Bos JA; van Neck HW; van der Wal KG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):818-26. PubMed ID: 19304040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single versus triple daily activation of the distractor: no significant effects of frequency of distraction on bone regenerate quantity and architecture.
    Djasim UM; Wolvius EB; Van Neck JW; Van Wamel A; Weinans H; Van Der Wal KGH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 36(3):143-151. PubMed ID: 18359239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histomorphometric comparison between continuous and discontinuous distraction osteogenesis.
    Djasim UM; Mathot BJ; Wolvius EB; van Neck JW; van der Wal KG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):398-404. PubMed ID: 19457679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rabbits as a model for research into craniofacial distraction osteogenesis.
    Djasim UM; Hekking-Weijma JM; Wolvius EB; van Neck JW; van der Wal KG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):620-4. PubMed ID: 18499312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis.
    Moore C; Campbell PM; Dechow PC; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responses of distraction regenerate to high-frequency traction at a rapid rate.
    Liu XL; Zhang HX; Ma L; Peng L; Cheung LK; Zheng LW
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Apr; 72(4):1035-9. PubMed ID: 22491623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone regeneration and fracture healing. Experience with distraction osteogenesis model.
    Richards M; Goulet JA; Weiss JA; Waanders NA; Schaffler MB; Goldstein SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355 Suppl):S191-204. PubMed ID: 9917639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of bone regenerative capacity following distraction osteogenesis of goat mandibles using two different bone cutting techniques.
    Nooh N; Abdullah WA; El-Awady Grawish M; Ramalingam S; Hassan G; Javed F; Al-Hezaimi K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23810515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?
    Spencer AC; Campbell PM; Dechow P; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tooth movement into distraction regenerate: when should we start?
    El Sharaby FA; El Bokle NN; El Boghdadi DM; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):482-94. PubMed ID: 21457859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental evaluation of acute molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit model.
    Candırlı C; Dolanmaz D; Etöz OA; Avunduk MC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 20576452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cranial bone transport distraction with and without adipose grafting.
    Koch FP; Yuhasz MM; Travieso R; Wong K; Clune J; Zhuang ZW; Van Houten J; Steinbacher DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 24820707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of gene expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 between continuous and intermittent distraction osteogenesis: a quantitative study on rabbits.
    Liu XL; Cheung LK; Zhang HX; Li JY; Ma L; Zheng LW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):e185-8. PubMed ID: 22093241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angiogenesis is enhanced by continuous traction in rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Zheng LW; Ma L; Cheung LK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19428266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in a rabbit model.
    Zheng LW; Cheung LK
    Tissue Eng; 2006 Nov; 12(11):3181-8. PubMed ID: 17518632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transsutural distraction osteogenesis applied to maxillary complex with new internalized distraction device: analysis of the feasibility and long-term osteogenesis outcome.
    Tong H; Gao F; Yin J; Zhang X; Zhang C; Yin N; Zhao Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 25643339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. bFGF-Modified BMMSCs enhance bone regeneration following distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
    Jiang X; Zou S; Ye B; Zhu S; Liu Y; Hu J
    Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1156-61. PubMed ID: 20036345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of irradiated mandibles with mesenchymal stem cells transfected with bone morphogenetic protein 2/7.
    Zhang WB; Zheng LW; Chua DT; Cheung LK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1711-6. PubMed ID: 22580096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.
    Peacock ZS; Tricomi BJ; Murphy BA; Magill JC; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1073-84. PubMed ID: 23499159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in an experimental model.
    Cheung LK; Zheng LW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):100-8; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 16432416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.