These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304429)
1. The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography. Sung YM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Choe BK Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 19304429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis]. Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hiai Y; Hashida M; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Doi K Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 16733502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors. Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors. Scharitzer M; Prokop M; Weber M; Fuchsjäger M; Oschatz E; Schaefer-Prokop C Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 15601893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities. Ueguchi T; Johkoh T; Tomiyama N; Honda O; Mihara N; Hamada S; Murai S; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors. Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Jinnnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Kawanami S; Okamoto T; Sasaki M; Honda H Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 25168020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Buls N; Shabana W; Verbeek P; Pevenage P; De Mey J Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):738-43. PubMed ID: 17709363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom. Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. Langer S; Bartholmai B; Fetterly K; Harmsen S; Ryan W; Erickson B; Andriole K; Carrino J J Digit Imaging; 2004 Sep; 17(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 15534750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. Balassy C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15728593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of simulated chest lesions by using soft-copy reading: comparison of an amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector system and a storage-phosphor system. Goo JM; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Seo JB; Kim HY; Lee YJ; Kang JW; Kim JH Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):242-6. PubMed ID: 12091690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs. Usami H; Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Fukushima H; Shimamoto K Eur Radiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):726-32. PubMed ID: 16284772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules. Hwang SA; Seo JB; Choi BK; Do KH; Ko SM; Lee SH; Lee JS; Song JW; Song KS; Lim TH Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 14530643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance. Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis. Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of liquid crystal display monitors calibrated with gray-scale standard display function and with γ 2.2 and iPad: observer performance in detection of cerebral infarction on brain CT. Yoshimura K; Nihashi T; Ikeda M; Ando Y; Kawai H; Kawakami K; Kimura R; Okada Y; Okochi Y; Ota N; Tsuchiya K; Naganawa S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):1304-9. PubMed ID: 23701069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic detection performance of a simulated nodule in chest computed tomography images and gray and color nuclear medicine images: comparison between a medical liquid crystal display monitor and an ordinary liquid crystal display monitor]. Okumura E; Kamimae R; Miyashita K; Ueda R; Kanmae Y; Kubo M; Shirasaka N; Takeda T; Hashimoto N Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Aug; 70(8):757-67. PubMed ID: 25142386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography. Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographs. Fukushima H; Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Usami H; Shimamoto K Radiat Med; 2007 Jun; 25(5):211-7. PubMed ID: 17581709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]