These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304604)

  • 41. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: the case of the SNARC effect.
    Caessens B; Hommel B; Reynvoet B; van der Goten K
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Oct; 131(4):411-25. PubMed ID: 15523822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The ups and downs (and lefts and rights) of synaesthetic number forms: validation from spatial cueing and SNARC-type tasks.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Maxwell EC; Nicholls ME; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1190-9. PubMed ID: 19660746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: evidence from the operational momentum effect.
    Knops A; Viarouge A; Dehaene S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):803-21. PubMed ID: 19429960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contextual effects on number-time interaction.
    Lu A; Hodges B; Zhang J; Zhang JX
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 19640515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The laterality effect: myth or truth?
    Cohen Kadosh R
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):350-4. PubMed ID: 17548211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
    Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. There's a SNARC in the Size Congruity Task.
    Weis T; Theobald S; Schmitt A; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1978. PubMed ID: 30450061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
    Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. SNARC-like congruency based on number magnitude and response duration.
    Kiesel A; Vierck E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 19210098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Paying attention to attention: evidence for an attentional contribution to the size congruity effect.
    Risko EF; Maloney EA; Fugelsang JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1137-47. PubMed ID: 23709065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Behavioral dynamics of the affordance "graspable".
    Lopresti-Goodman SM; Turvey MT; Frank TD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1948-65. PubMed ID: 21691904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill.
    Cipora K; Nuerk HC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1974-91. PubMed ID: 23473520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?
    Fitousi D; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):445-57. PubMed ID: 16752607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled?
    Tokita M; Ishiguchi A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1839-53. PubMed ID: 20952782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.