These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304610)
1. Shape memory for intrinsic versus accidental holes. Nelson R; Thierman J; Palmer SE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):200-6. PubMed ID: 19304610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Figure-ground effects on shape memory for objects versus holes. Palmer S; Davis J; Nelson R; Rock I Perception; 2008; 37(10):1569-86. PubMed ID: 19065859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects. Balas BJ; Sinha P Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):396-411. PubMed ID: 15910127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bouba and Kiki inside objects: Sound-shape correspondence for objects with a hole. Kim SH Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104132. PubMed ID: 31726323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental rotation depends on the number of objects rather than on the number of image fragments. Koning A; van Lier R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Sep; 117(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 15288229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition. Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective. Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects. Nakayama K; Shimojo S; Silverman GH Perception; 1989; 18(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 2771595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect. Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The time course of perception and retrieval in matching and recognition. Kent C; Lamberts K J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):920-31. PubMed ID: 16846288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The shape of a hole is perceived as the shape of its interior. Nelson R; Reiss JE; Gong X; Conklin S; Parker L; Palmer SE Perception; 2014; 43(10):1033-48. PubMed ID: 25509681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? Vecera SP; Farah MJ Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1280-96. PubMed ID: 9401461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrinsic orientation and study viewpoint in recognizing spatial structure of a shape. Li X; Mou W; McNamara TP Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):518-23. PubMed ID: 19451378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]