261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304615)
1. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
Wühr P; Biebl R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects.
Wühr P; Biebl R; Ansorge U
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 18444754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
Lu CH; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
Druey MD; Hübner R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
Wühr P; Kunde W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration.
Kunde W; Stöcker C
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):581-92. PubMed ID: 12047060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects.
Liu X; Park Y; Gu X; Fan J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1710-20. PubMed ID: 20675812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
Buetti S; Kerzel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis.
Iani C; Ricci F; Baroni G; Rubichi S
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):856-63. PubMed ID: 19648030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
Welsh TN
Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
Buetti S; Kerzel D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning.
Braem S; Verguts T; Notebaert W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1662-6. PubMed ID: 21728466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
