219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304620)
1. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):672-82. PubMed ID: 20348574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
Burnham BR; Neely JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
Anderson BA; Folk CL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is top-down about contingent capture?
Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.
Schreij D; Owens C; Theeuwes J
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 18372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
Wykowska A; Schubö A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.
Ansorge U; Heumann M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
Yeh SL; Liao HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
Yeh SL; Liao HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
Burnham BR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
Wienrich C; Janczyk M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 20121291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
Moore KS; Weissman DH
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
