These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304623)

  • 1. Implicit learning modulates selective attention at sensory levels of perceptual processing.
    Couperus JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 19304623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field.
    Shoji H; Skrandies W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16356572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Covert processing of visual form in the absence of area LO.
    Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1488-95. PubMed ID: 15246286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study.
    Fu S; Zinni M; Squire PN; Kumar R; Caggiano DM; Parasuraman R
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1345-55. PubMed ID: 18006335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual load influences selective attention across development.
    Couperus JW
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Sep; 47(5):1431-9. PubMed ID: 21688896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The functional anatomy of inspection time: an event-related fMRI study.
    Deary IJ; Simonotto E; Meyer M; Marshall A; Marshall I; Goddard N; Wardlaw JM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1466-79. PubMed ID: 15275904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs.
    Codispoti M; Ferrari V; Junghöfer M; Schupp HT
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):583-91. PubMed ID: 16750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterogeneity of information-processing alterations according to dimensions of depression: an event-related potentials study.
    Pierson A; Ragot R; Van Hooff J; Partiot A; Renault B; Jouvent R
    Biol Psychiatry; 1996 Jul; 40(2):98-115. PubMed ID: 8793042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task difficulty modulates electrophysiological correlates of perceptual learning.
    Wang Y; Song Y; Qu Z; Ding Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 19969030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming.
    Henson RN; Rylands A; Ross E; Vuilleumeir P; Rugg MD
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1674-89. PubMed ID: 15050590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of encoding and retrieving emotional events.
    Koenig S; Mecklinger A
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):162-73. PubMed ID: 18410190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The electrophysiological correlates of stimulus visibility and metacontrast masking.
    Railo H; Koivisto M
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):794-803. PubMed ID: 19268608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study.
    Trenner MU; Schweinberger SR; Jentzsch I; Sommer W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):388-400. PubMed ID: 15511654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.