BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304627)

  • 1. Symbolic control of attention: tracking its temporal dynamics.
    Hommel B; Akyürek EG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 19304627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
    Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.
    Pratt J; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 14585008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
    Gibson BS; Scheutz M; Davis GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neural correlates of attention orienting in visuospatial working memory for detecting feature and conjunction changes.
    Yeh YY; Kuo BC; Liu HL
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.
    Chen Z; Tsou BH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1082-95. PubMed ID: 21264740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently.
    Grainger J; Tydgat I; Isselé J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):673-88. PubMed ID: 20515197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonattentional effects of nonpredictive central cues.
    Ivanoff J; Saoud W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 19429965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insights into the control of attentional set in ADHD using the attentional blink paradigm.
    Mason DJ; Humphreys GW; Kent L
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 46(12):1345-53. PubMed ID: 16313435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenstein MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):973-85. PubMed ID: 16846292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.