These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304649)

  • 1. Processing of natural images is feedforward: a simple behavioral test.
    Schmidt T; Schmidt F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):594-606. PubMed ID: 19304649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primes and targets in rapid chases: tracing sequential waves of motor activation.
    Schmidt T; Niehaus S; Nagel A
    Behav Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 120(5):1005-16. PubMed ID: 17014252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors.
    Schmidt F; Schmidt T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response priming driven by local contrast, not subjective brightness.
    Schmidt T; Miksch S; Bulganin L; Jäger F; Lossin F; Jochum J; Kohl P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1556-68. PubMed ID: 20675800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials.
    Vath N; Schmidt T
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 17258867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual processing in rapid-chase systems: image processing, attention, and awareness.
    Schmidt T; Haberkamp A; Veltkamp GM; Weber A; Seydell-Greenwald A; Schmidt F
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():169. PubMed ID: 21811484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective view of the impact of prime validity on response speed and selection in the arrow classification task with free choice trials.
    Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 20139465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inverse target- and cue-priming effects of masked stimuli.
    Mattler U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 17311481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct versus indirect processing changes the influence of color in natural scene categorization.
    Otsuka S; Kawaguchi J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1588-97. PubMed ID: 19801618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How much attention does an event file need?
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1067-82. PubMed ID: 16262499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring visuomotor priming following biological and non-biological stimuli.
    Gowen E; Bradshaw C; Galpin A; Lawrence A; Poliakoff E
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 20846771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A task-difficulty artifact in subliminal priming.
    Pratte MS; Rouder JN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1276-83. PubMed ID: 19633343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
    Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.