These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19304679)
1. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? Shin JH; Han BK; Ko EY; Choe YH; Nam SJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):W187-91. PubMed ID: 19304679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review. Patterson SK; Neal CH; Jeffries DO; Joe A; Klein K; Bailey J; Pinsky R; Paramagul C; Watcharotone K Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 25151294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast mass. Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):1135-41. PubMed ID: 19304725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred? Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographically occult screen detected breast masses: a retrospective analysis of cases undergoing biopsy. Shetty MK; Watson AB Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18164391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses. Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Oh KK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):202-7. PubMed ID: 18094312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome. Raza S; Chikarmane SA; Neilsen SS; Zorn LM; Birdwell RL Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Graf O; Helbich TH; Hopf G; Graf C; Sickles EA Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 17581897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy: comparison of sonographic features and biopsy methods. Shin HJ; Kim HH; Kim SM; Yang HR; Sohn JH; Kwon GY; Gong G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar; 190(3):630-6. PubMed ID: 18287432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)]. Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjäger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 15346259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Shah VI; Raju U; Chitale D; Deshpande V; Gregory N; Strand V Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1824-31. PubMed ID: 12673707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique, accuracy and indications]. Buchberger W; Niehoff A; Obrist P; Rettl G; Dünser M Radiologe; 2002 Jan; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11930538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Lee SH; Chung HK; Cho KS; Park IA; Noh DY Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 15968149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast. Rosen EL; Bentley RC; Baker JA; Soo MS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1185-92. PubMed ID: 12388496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. Harvey JA; Nicholson BT; Lorusso AP; Cohen MA; Bovbjerg VE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19933671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging. Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. Crystal P; Koretz M; Shcharynsky S; Makarov V; Strano S J Clin Ultrasound; 2005 Feb; 33(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 15674836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]