These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1930520)

  • 1. The interaction of student gender and standardized-patient gender on a performance-based examination of clinical competence.
    Colliver JA; Marcy ML; Travis TA; Robbs RS
    Acad Med; 1991 Sep; 66(9 Suppl):S31-3. PubMed ID: 1930520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influences of student and standardized patient genders on scoring in an objective structured clinical examination.
    Rutala PJ; Witzke DB; Leko EO; Fulginiti JV
    Acad Med; 1991 Sep; 66(9 Suppl):S28-30. PubMed ID: 1844128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is clinical competence perceived differently for student daily performance on the wards versus clerkship grading?
    Wimmers PF; Kanter SL; Splinter TA; Schmidt HG
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 17690992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric characteristics of a write-up assessment form in a medicine core clerkship.
    Kogan JR; Shea JA
    Teach Learn Med; 2005; 17(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 15833718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of clerkship experiences on clinical competence.
    Wimmers PF; Schmidt HG; Splinter TA
    Med Educ; 2006 May; 40(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 16635125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender plays no role in student ability to perform on computer-based examinations.
    Kies SM; Williams BD; Freund GG
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 6():57. PubMed ID: 17132169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of an objective structured clinical examination in evaluating student performance.
    Prislin MD; Fitzpatrick CF; Lie D; Giglio M; Radecki S; Lewis E
    Fam Med; 1998 May; 30(5):338-44. PubMed ID: 9597531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrelationships between knowledge and performance-based testing in a surgery clerkship.
    Schwartz RW; Donnelly MB; Nash PP; Young B
    Acad Med; 1991 Sep; 66(9 Suppl):S19-21. PubMed ID: 1930517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relating student performance on a family medicine clerkship with completion of Web cases.
    Shokar GS; Burdine RL; Callaway M; Bulik RJ
    Fam Med; 2005 Oct; 37(9):620-2. PubMed ID: 16193415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of surgery clerkship performance raters.
    Littlefield JH; DaRosa DA; Anderson KD; Bell RM; Nicholas GG; Wolfson PJ
    Acad Med; 1991 Sep; 66(9 Suppl):S16-8. PubMed ID: 1930516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient gender, and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skills.
    Colliver JA; Vu NV; Marcy ML; Travis TA; Robbs RS
    Acad Med; 1993 Feb; 68(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 8431238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do clinical evaluations in a psychiatry clerkship favor students with positive personality characteristics?
    Chibnall JT; Blaskiewicz RJ
    Acad Psychiatry; 2008; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18467476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sharing of information by students in an objective structured clinical examination.
    Rutala PJ; Witzke DB; Leko EO; Fulginiti JV; Taylor PJ
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Mar; 151(3):541-4. PubMed ID: 2001137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Written case reports as assessment of the elective student clerkship: consistency of central grading and comparison with ratings of clinical performance.
    Molenaar WM; Reinders JJ; Koopmans SA; Talsma MD; van Essen LH
    Med Teach; 2004 Jun; 26(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 15203841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global clinical performance rating, reliability and validity in an undergraduate clerkship.
    Daelmans HE; van der Hem-Stokroos HH; Hoogenboom RJ; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
    Neth J Med; 2005; 63(7):279-84. PubMed ID: 16093582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of medical student performance in the clinical years.
    Daugherty SR; Blumberg P; Leksas L; Hedeger D
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():51-6. PubMed ID: 3218875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Checklist agreement between standardized patients and faculty.
    Kopp KC; Johnson JA
    J Dent Educ; 1995 Aug; 59(8):824-9. PubMed ID: 7499599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of performance-based assessment scores and traditional measures in predicting first-year residency performance.
    Distlehorst LH; Verhulst SJ; Vu NV; Barrows HS
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():176-81. PubMed ID: 3218853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating medical student obstetrics and gynecology clerkship performance: which assessment tools are most reliable?
    Nahum GG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1762-71. PubMed ID: 15547561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sharpening the eye of the OSCE with critical action analysis.
    Payne NJ; Bradley EB; Heald EB; Maughan KL; Michaelsen VE; Wang XQ; Corbett EC
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 18820517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.