These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19305247)

  • 1. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in oral rehabilitation.
    Turcio KH; Goiato MC; Gennari Filho H; dos Santos DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):471-4. PubMed ID: 19305247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanics studies in dentistry: bioengineering applied in oral implantology.
    Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; Gomes EA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19568186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods used for assessing stresses in buccomaxillary prostheses: photoelasticity, finite element technique, and extensometry.
    Goiato MC; Tonella BP; Ribeiro Pdo P; Ferraço R; Pellizzer EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):561-4. PubMed ID: 19305257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants.
    Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; Filho HG; Monteiro DR; Santos DM; Haddad MF; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 24779954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photoelastic study of the support structures of distal-extension removable partial dentures.
    Costa MM; da Silva MA; Oliveira SA; Gomes VL; Carvalho PM; Lucas BL
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):589-95. PubMed ID: 19531158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical methods applied in dentistry: a comparative overview of photoelastic examinations, strain gauge measurements, finite element analysis and three-dimensional deformation analysis.
    Karl M; Dickinson A; Holst S; Holst A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):50-7. PubMed ID: 19645304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Basic biomechanical considerations for implant case planning.
    Riley R
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1995 Nov; 12(9):24-8. PubMed ID: 9584713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Center of resistance of anterior arch segment.
    Matsui S; Caputo AA; Chaconas SJ; Kiyomura H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 10935957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusion and restorative dentistry: Part II.
    Gray HS
    N Z Dent J; 1993 Jul; 89(397):87-91. PubMed ID: 8355906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanics of endodontic endosseous implants--a comparative photoelastic evaluation.
    Asundi A; Kishen A
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1999 Apr; 15(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 10379278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical effects of splint types on traumatized tooth: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Burcak Cengiz S; Stephan Atac A; Cehreli ZC
    Dent Traumatol; 2006 Jun; 22(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16643288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis.
    Silva NR; Castro CG; Santos-Filho PC; Silva GR; Campos RE; Soares PV; Soares CJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19553714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biomechanical testing of DIAKOR implants by photoelastic stress analysis].
    Kemper R; Szücs A; Divinyi T; Thamm F
    Fogorv Sz; 1992 Oct; 85(10):299-307. PubMed ID: 1303875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using implant positions: treatment planning canine and first molar rules.
    Misch CE; Silc JT
    Dent Today; 2009 Aug; 28(8):66, 68, 70-1. PubMed ID: 19715069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Rehabilitation of chewing function and after care in geriatrics].
    Müller N
    Fortschr Med; 1996 Aug; 114(22-23):270-2. PubMed ID: 8974960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A biomechanical study of flexible penile implants].
    Subrini L
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1993; 27(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 8352583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New trends in prosthetic dentistry.
    Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Prague Med Rep; 2006; 107(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 17066736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.