BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19306059)

  • 1. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging.
    Egorov V; Kearney T; Pollak SB; Rohatgi C; Sarvazyan N; Airapetian S; Browning S; Sarvazyan A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Nov; 118(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 19306059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
    Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesion by sound touch elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Huang L; Ma M; Du Z; Liu Z; Gong X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219943. PubMed ID: 31318932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disparity mapping applied to sonography of the breast: technical note.
    Steinberg BD; Sullivan DC; Carlson DL
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):545-50. PubMed ID: 9577508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
    Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
    Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography.
    Horsch K; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Venta LA
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 15035517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.
    Xu H; Rao M; Varghese T; Sommer A; Baker S; Hall TJ; Sisney GA; Burnside ES
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1813-24. PubMed ID: 20800948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
    Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonoelastography of breast lesions: a prospective study of 215 cases with histopathological correlation.
    Gheonea IA; Donoiu L; Camen D; Popescu FC; Bondari S
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(4):1209-14. PubMed ID: 22203924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
    Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical imaging as an adjunct to sonograph in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.
    Zhu Q; Conant E; Chance B
    J Biomed Opt; 2000 Apr; 5(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 10938788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
    Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of acoustic shear wave velocity measurement in characterization of breast lesions.
    Zhou J; Zhan W; Chang C; Zhang J; Yang Z; Dong Y; Zhou C; Song Y
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Feb; 32(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 23341385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optical tomography of the breast using a multi-channel time-resolved imager.
    Yates T; Hebden JC; Gibson A; Everdell N; Arridge SR; Douek M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2503-17. PubMed ID: 15901951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
    Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria.
    Wedegärtner U; Bick U; Wörtler K; Rummeny E; Bongartz G
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1645-50. PubMed ID: 11511885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
    Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
    Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.