These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19306598)

  • 21. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.
    Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exposing the gingival margin: a systematic approach for the control of hemorrhage.
    Nemetz H; Donovan T; Landesman H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 May; 51(5):647-51. PubMed ID: 6374120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Studies on the impression of crown preparations by means of the double impression method with special reference to the widening of the gingival pocket].
    Weiskopf J; Frentzen H; Schönherr U
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1967 Jan; 17(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 5336041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Drugs in dentistry. Agents for gingival retraction.
    Ciancio SG
    Dent Manage; 1986 Jul; 26(7):59-61. PubMed ID: 3525263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
    Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. EXPOSING THE GINGIVAL MARGIN BY TAKING IMPRESSIONS WITH ELASTIC MATERIAL--SOME CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS.
    ANNEROTH G; GOERANSSON P
    Odontol Tidskr; 1965 Jun; 73():394-409. PubMed ID: 14317732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cotton pellets and gingival retraction cords. Clinical notes No. 2.
    Tyas M
    Aust Dent J; 1984 Aug; 29(4):279. PubMed ID: 6395843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Influence of the type of impression material, impression tray and making impression technology on the dimensional accuracy and depth of impression material penetration into "gingival sulcus". In vitro study].
    Riakhovskiĭ AN; Muradov MA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2005; 84(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 16091710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Gingival retraction and impression technic with elastomeric materials].
    Boudrias P
    J Dent Que; 1987 Nov; 24():523-9. PubMed ID: 3077394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chemical Retraction Agents - in vivo and in vitro Studies into their Physico-Chemical Properties, Biocompatibility with Gingival Margin Tissues and Compatibility with Elastomer Impression Materials.
    Nowakowska D; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Wicckiewicz W
    Mini Rev Med Chem; 2017; 17(5):435-444. PubMed ID: 27087463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords.
    Jokstad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 10050111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of a cordless retraction paste on titanium surface: a topographic, chemical and biocompatibility evaluation.
    Cooper K; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Reid M; Stirling C; Dias G
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 23739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Gingival sulcus and retraction techniques. Anatomo-histological aspects].
    Barlattani A
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep; 59(14):56-60, 63-4. PubMed ID: 1778278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Tissue displacement and impression techniques--part 1].
    Levartovsky S; Masri M; Alter E; Pilo R
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jul; 29(3):19-27, 55. PubMed ID: 23256394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Impressions techniques--Part 2].
    Levartovsky S; Masri M; Alter E; Pilo R
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Oct; 29(4):33-8, 71. PubMed ID: 23367724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Gingival retraction using Gingifoam. Inflation exposes the margin].
    Martignoni M; Feinman P
    Attual Dent; 1985 Nov; 1(30):13-7. PubMed ID: 3914901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.