These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19306921)
1. An objective method to measure electrode independence in cochlear implant patients with a dual-masker forward masking technique. Klop WM; Frijns JH; Soede W; Briaire JJ Hear Res; 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):3-14. PubMed ID: 19306921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers. Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients. Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe. Bingabr MG; Espinoza-Varas B; Sigdel S Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 24606491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities. Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Vanpoucke FJ; Bongers JS; Briaire JJ Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 129(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 19117170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays. Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Stille LJ Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation. Cohen LT Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]