These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19307609)

  • 21. Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
    Montville R; Froissart R; Remold SK; Tenaillon O; Turner PE
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Nov; 3(11):e381. PubMed ID: 16248678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Complementation and epistasis in viral coinfection dynamics.
    Gao H; Feldman MW
    Genetics; 2009 May; 182(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 19270273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robustness and epistasis in mutation-selection models.
    Wolff A; Krug J
    Phys Biol; 2009 May; 6(3):036007. PubMed ID: 19411737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population.
    Khan AI; Dinh DM; Schneider D; Lenski RE; Cooper TF
    Science; 2011 Jun; 332(6034):1193-6. PubMed ID: 21636772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift.
    de Visser JA; Elena SF
    Nat Rev Genet; 2007 Feb; 8(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 17230200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of population size and mutation rate on the evolution of mutational robustness.
    Elena SF; Wilke CO; Ofria C; Lenski RE
    Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 17348929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of genetic robustness on evolvability in digital organisms.
    Elena SF; Sanjuán R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Oct; 8():284. PubMed ID: 18854018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Loss of least-loaded class in asexual populations due to drift and epistasis.
    Jain K
    Genetics; 2008 Aug; 179(4):2125-34. PubMed ID: 18689884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A conservative test of genetic drift in the endosymbiotic bacterium Buchnera: slightly deleterious mutations in the chaperonin groEL.
    Herbeck JT; Funk DJ; Degnan PH; Wernegreen JJ
    Genetics; 2003 Dec; 165(4):1651-60. PubMed ID: 14704156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mapping the Peaks: Fitness Landscapes of the Fittest and the Flattest.
    Franklin J; LaBar T; Adami C
    Artif Life; 2019; 25(3):250-262. PubMed ID: 31397601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selection for robustness in mutagenized RNA viruses.
    Sanjuán R; Cuevas JM; Furió V; Holmes EC; Moya A
    PLoS Genet; 2007 Jun; 3(6):e93. PubMed ID: 17571922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories.
    Draghi JA; Plotkin JB
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3120-31. PubMed ID: 24151997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Drift Barriers to Quality Control When Genes Are Expressed at Different Levels.
    Xiong K; McEntee JP; Porfirio DJ; Masel J
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):397-407. PubMed ID: 27838629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Nonstationary Dynamics of Fitness Distributions: Asexual Model with Epistasis and Standing Variation.
    Martin G; Roques L
    Genetics; 2016 Dec; 204(4):1541-1558. PubMed ID: 27770037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex.
    Lohaus R; Burch CL; Azevedo RB
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S142-57. PubMed ID: 20421324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The causes of epistasis.
    de Visser JA; Cooper TF; Elena SF
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Dec; 278(1725):3617-24. PubMed ID: 21976687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Survival and innovation: The role of mutational robustness in evolution.
    Fares MA
    Biochimie; 2015 Dec; 119():254-61. PubMed ID: 25447135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of gene interactions on the long-term response to selection.
    Paixão T; Barton NH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Apr; 113(16):4422-7. PubMed ID: 27044080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of epistatic selection on the genomic traces of selection.
    Otto SP; Whitlock MC
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Dec; 18(24):4985-7. PubMed ID: 20025656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strong Selection Significantly Increases Epistatic Interactions in the Long-Term Evolution of a Protein.
    Gupta A; Adami C
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1005960. PubMed ID: 27028897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.