These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1930838)

  • 1. Effects of the XR-bonding system on in vitro caries.
    Swift EJ; Linden JJ; Wefel JS
    Am J Dent; 1991 Aug; 4(4):157-61. PubMed ID: 1930838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the XR bonding system on microleakage.
    Swift EJ; Hansen SE; Bailey SJ
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 2150171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
    Mason PN; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogianis Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
    Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Jesen ME
    Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 2076235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.