170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19308820)
1. Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine?
Lavender SA; Li YC; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19308820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.
Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR
Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When is a lifting movement too asymmetric to identify low-back loading by 2-D analysis?
Kingma I; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH; Toussaint HM; Adams MA; Baten CT
Ergonomics; 1998 Oct; 41(10):1453-61. PubMed ID: 9802252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
Marras WS; Davis KG
Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
Chaffin DB; Page GB
Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
Behjati M; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo lumbo-sacral forces and moments during constant speed running at different stride lengths.
Seay J; Selbie WS; Hamill J
J Sports Sci; 2008 Dec; 26(14):1519-29. PubMed ID: 18937134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion.
Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110024. PubMed ID: 32961423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inertial effects from single body segments in dynamic analysis of lifting.
Lindbeck L; Arborelius UP
Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 1860462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar spine loads during the lifting of extremely heavy weights.
Cholewicki J; McGill SM; Norman RW
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Oct; 23(10):1179-86. PubMed ID: 1758295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting.
Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
J Spinal Disord; 1999 Oct; 12(5):436-47. PubMed ID: 10549710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
Shin G; Mirka G
Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The error of L5/S1 joint moment calculation in a body-centered non-inertial reference frame when the fictitious force is ignored.
Xu X; Faber GS; Kingma I; Chang CC; Hsiang SM
J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1943-7. PubMed ID: 23768468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
