These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19308820)

  • 21. Dynamic biomechanical modelling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA; Love AC; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1289-310. PubMed ID: 7925254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical exploration on dynamic modes of lifting.
    Gagnon M; Smyth G
    Ergonomics; 1992 Mar; 35(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 1572341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering.
    Gagnon D; Gagnon M
    J Biomech; 1992 Aug; 25(8):891-901. PubMed ID: 1639833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of backpacks on the lumbar spine in children: a standing magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Neuschwander TB; Cutrone J; Macias BR; Cutrone S; Murthy G; Chambers H; Hargens AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 20023607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is the trunk movement more perturbed after an asymmetric than after a symmetric perturbation during lifting?
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Jul; 37(7):1071-7. PubMed ID: 15165877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions.
    Marras WS; Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 2000 May; 43(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 10877482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
    Dehghan P; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of posture in mechanics of the lumbar spine in compression.
    Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Aug; 9(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 8877953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.
    Allread WG; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles.
    Davis KG; Marras WS; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1155-68. PubMed ID: 9715674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
    Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
    Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of fatigue failure responses of old versus middle-aged lumbar motion segments in simulated flexed lifting.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Litsky AS; Burr D; Landoll J; Matkovic V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1832-9. PubMed ID: 17762290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A direct comparison of spine rotational stiffness and dynamic spine stability during repetitive lifting tasks.
    Graham RB; Brown SH
    J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(9):1593-600. PubMed ID: 22542218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.