These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19308824)

  • 1. Comparison of required operating forces between floor-based and overhead-mounted patient lifting devices.
    Rice MS; Woolley SM; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 19308824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical assessment of floor and overhead lifts using one or two caregivers for patient transfers.
    Dutta T; Holliday PJ; Gorski SM; Baharvandy MS; Fernie GR
    Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 21875699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Mar; 52(3):384-97. PubMed ID: 19296324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External Hand Forces Exerted by Long-Term Care Staff to Push Floor-Based Lifts: Effects of Flooring System and Resident Weight.
    Lachance CC; Korall AM; Russell CM; Feldman F; Robinovitch SN; Mackey DC
    Hum Factors; 2016 Sep; 58(6):927-43. PubMed ID: 27098263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of nursing tasks.
    Baptiste A
    Work; 2011; 40(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 21876267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ergonomic Assessment of Floor-based and Overhead Lifts.
    Waters TR; Dick R; Lowe B; Werren D; Parsons K
    Am J Safe Patient Handl Mov; 2012 Dec; 2(4):119-113. PubMed ID: 26550545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of ceiling lifts: transfer time, patient comfort and staff perceptions.
    Alamgir H; Li OW; Yu S; Gorman E; Fast C; Kidd C
    Injury; 2009 Sep; 40(9):987-92. PubMed ID: 19486965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices.
    Santaguida PL; Pierrynowski M; Goldsmith C; Fernie G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Nov; 20(9):906-16. PubMed ID: 16054280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of squat lift training and free weight muscle training on maximum lifting load and isolinetic peak torque of young adults without impairments.
    Yeung SS; Ng GY
    Phys Ther; 2000 Jun; 80(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10842410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mathematical and empirical proof of principle for an on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD).
    Abdoli-Eramaki M; Stevenson JM; Reid SA; Bryant TJ
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1694-700. PubMed ID: 17466313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed.
    Garg A; Owen B; Beller D; Banaag J
    Ergonomics; 1991 Mar; 34(3):289-312. PubMed ID: 1829037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [EMG and forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices].
    De Vito G; Meroni R; Riva MA; Mauri R; Giunco F; Conti S; Cesana GC
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2011; 33(3 Suppl):230-4. PubMed ID: 23393843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for lower back injury in male dancers performing ballet lifts.
    Alderson J; Hopper L; Elliott B; Ackland T
    J Dance Med Sci; 2009; 13(3):83-9. PubMed ID: 19754984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An ergonomic comparison between mechanical and manual patient transfer techniques.
    Silvia CE; Bloswick DS; Lillquist D; Wallace D; Perkins MS
    Work; 2002; 19(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 12454348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spinal loads during individual and team lifting.
    Dennis GJ; Barrett RS
    Ergonomics; 2002 Aug; 45(10):671-81. PubMed ID: 12437851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scaling of lifting forces in relation to object size in whole body lifting.
    Kingma I; Van Dieën JH; Toussaint HM
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):1020-30. PubMed ID: 16147418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repositioning a slumped person in a wheelchair. A biomechanical analysis of three transfer techniques.
    Varcin-Coad L; Barrett R
    AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):530-6. PubMed ID: 9934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfer of the horizontal patient: the effect of a friction reducing assistive device on low back mechanics.
    McGill SM; Kavcic NS
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):915-29. PubMed ID: 16147412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced push forces accompany device use during sliding transfers of seated subjects.
    Grevelding P; Bohannon RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 11322467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.