760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19309176)
1. Prediction of HPLC retention index using artificial neural networks and IGroup E-state indices.
Albaugh DR; Hall LM; Hill DW; Kertesz TM; Parham M; Hall LH; Grant DF
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):788-99. PubMed ID: 19309176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QSAR modeling of human serum protein binding with several modeling techniques utilizing structure-information representation.
Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LM; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 2006 Nov; 49(24):7169-81. PubMed ID: 17125269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative study of the structure-retention index relationship in the imine family.
Acevedo-Martínez J; Escalona-Arranz JC; Villar-Rojas A; Téllez-Palmero F; Pérez-Rosés R; González L; Carrasco-Velar R
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Jan; 1102(1-2):238-44. PubMed ID: 16288769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of intrinsic solubility of generic drugs using MLR, ANN and SVM analyses.
Louis B; Agrawal VK; Khadikar PV
Eur J Med Chem; 2010 Sep; 45(9):4018-25. PubMed ID: 20584562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of human skin permeability using artificial neural network (ANN) modeling.
Chen LJ; Lian GP; Han LJ
Acta Pharmacol Sin; 2007 Apr; 28(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 17376301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of aqueous solubility based on large datasets using several QSPR models utilizing topological structure representation.
Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Hall LM
Chem Biodivers; 2004 Nov; 1(11):1829-41. PubMed ID: 17191819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QSPR modeling of soil sorption coefficients (K(OC)) of pesticides using SPA-ANN and SPA-MLR.
Goudarzi N; Goodarzi M; Araujo MC; Galvão RK
J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Aug; 57(15):7153-8. PubMed ID: 19722589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking of linear and nonlinear approaches for quantitative structure-property relationship studies of metal complexation with ionophores.
Tetko IV; Solov'ev VP; Antonov AV; Yao X; Doucet JP; Fan B; Hoonakker F; Fourches D; Jost P; Lachiche N; Varnek A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):808-19. PubMed ID: 16563012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wavelet neural network modeling in QSPR for prediction of solubility of 25 anthraquinone dyes at different temperatures and pressures in supercritical carbon dioxide.
Tabaraki R; Khayamian T; Ensafi AA
J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Sep; 25(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16337156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of capillary gas chromatographic retention times of fatty acid methyl esters in human blood using MLR, PLS and back-propagation artificial neural networks.
Gupta VK; Khani H; Ahmadi-Roudi B; Mirakhorli S; Fereyduni E; Agarwal S
Talanta; 2011 Jan; 83(3):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21147352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of the Lee retention indices of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by artificial neural network.
Skrbić B; Onjia A
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Mar; 1108(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 16464457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative structure migration relationship modeling of migration factor for some benzene derivatives in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.
Fatemi MH; Shamseddin H; Malekzadeh H
J Sep Sci; 2009 Jun; 32(11):1934-40. PubMed ID: 19425021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A self-adaptive genetic algorithm-artificial neural network algorithm with leave-one-out cross validation for descriptor selection in QSAR study.
Wu J; Mei J; Wen S; Liao S; Chen J; Shen Y
J Comput Chem; 2010 Jul; 31(10):1956-68. PubMed ID: 20512843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of auto-ignition temperatures of hydrocarbons by neural network based on atom-type electrotopological-state indices.
Pan Y; Jiang J; Wang R; Cao H; Zhao J
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Sep; 157(2-3):510-7. PubMed ID: 18280036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of supercritical fluid chromatographic retention factors at different percents of organic modifiers in mobile phase.
Fatemi MH; Malekzadeh H; Shamseddin H
J Sep Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(4):653-9. PubMed ID: 19160374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of impact sensitivity of nitro energetic compounds by neural network based on electrotopological-state indices.
Wang R; Jiang J; Pan Y; Cao H; Cui Y
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(1):155-86. PubMed ID: 19101083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple linear regression and artificial neural network retention prediction models for ginsenosides on a polyamine-bonded stationary phase in hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
Quiming NS; Denola NL; Saito Y; Jinno K
J Sep Sci; 2008 May; 31(9):1550-63. PubMed ID: 18435511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combination of artificial neural network technique and linear free energy relationship parameters in the prediction of gradient retention times in liquid chromatography.
Fatemi MH; Abraham MH; Poole CF
J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1190(1-2):241-52. PubMed ID: 18395736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modelling of the effect of solute structure and mobile phase pH and composition on the retention of phenoxy acid herbicides in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.
Aschi M; D'Archivio AA; Mazzeo P; Pierabella M; Ruggieri F
Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Jun; 616(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 18482595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
