25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19309212)
1. Testing effects for self-generated versus experimenter-provided questions.
Myers SJ; Hausman H; Rhodes MG
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Jun; 30(2):241-257. PubMed ID: 37589715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Availability bias in students: From test questions to real patients.
Hoang NS
Med Teach; 2023 Nov; 45(11):1306. PubMed ID: 37535832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple-choice quizzes improve memory for misinformation debunks, but do not reduce belief in misinformation.
Collier JR; Pillai RM; Fazio LK
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jun; 8(1):37. PubMed ID: 37278735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing improves performance as well as assesses learning: A review of the testing effect with implications for models of learning.
Polack CW; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(3):222-241. PubMed ID: 35446091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Testing as a Learning Tool.
Yang BW; Razo J; Persky AM
Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Nov; 83(9):7324. PubMed ID: 31871352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.
Marsh EJ; Fazio LK; Goswick AE
Memory; 2012; 20(8):899-906. PubMed ID: 22891857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests.
Fazio LK; Agarwal PK; Marsh EJ; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 20516221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda NJ; Pashler H; Vul E; Wixted JT; Rohrer D
Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 132(3):354-80. PubMed ID: 16719566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
Vyas R; Supe A
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.
Roediger HL; Marsh EJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1155-9. PubMed ID: 16248758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
Odegard TN; Koen JD
Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The usefulness of retrieval practice and review-only practice for answering conceptually related test questions.
Pilotti M; Chodorow M; Petrov R
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):179-203. PubMed ID: 19350834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
Halamish V; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
