409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19309217)
1. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy.
Haw RM; Fisher RP
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1106-12. PubMed ID: 15584846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images.
Thompson WB; Johnson J
J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification.
Greathouse SM; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 18594956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
Charman SD; Wells GL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
Clark SE; Wells GL
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators.
Boyce MA; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18060486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
Sauerland M; Sporer SL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Wright DB
Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications.
Zimmerman DM; Chorn JA; Rhead LM; Evelo AJ; Kovera MB
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):460-473. PubMed ID: 29265857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the effects of age and delay on children's person identifications: verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards.
Karageorge A; Zajac R
Br J Psychol; 2011 May; 102(2):161-83. PubMed ID: 21492140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators.
Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the presumption of evidentiary independence: can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?
Hasel LE; Kassin SM
Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 19152544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
