503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19309367)
1. Intense pulsed light vs. long-pulsed dye laser treatment of telangiectasia after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized split-lesion trial of two different treatments.
Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jun; 160(6):1237-41. PubMed ID: 19309367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.
Kono T; Groff WF; Sakurai H; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Nov; 59(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 17992138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intense pulsed light to 595-nm long-pulsed pulsed dye laser for treatment of hypertrophic surgical scars: a pilot study.
Bellew SG; Weiss MA; Weiss RA
J Drugs Dermatol; 2005; 4(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 16004017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation.
Faurschou A; Togsverd-Bo K; Zachariae C; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Feb; 160(2):359-64. PubMed ID: 19120324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for the treatment of facial telangiectasias: a randomized controlled trial.
Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Feb; 24(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 20205349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Split-face randomized treatment of facial telangiectasia comparing pulsed dye laser and an intense pulsed light handpiece.
Tanghetti EA
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Feb; 44(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22180317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin rejuvenation using intense pulsed light: a randomized controlled split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Hedelund L; Due E; Bjerring P; Wulf HC; Haedersdal M
Arch Dermatol; 2006 Aug; 142(8):985-90. PubMed ID: 16924047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser vs. intense pulsed light for hair removal in dark skin: a randomized controlled trial.
Ismail SA
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Feb; 166(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 21999492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative efficacy of nonpurpuragenic pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.
Neuhaus IM; Zane LT; Tope WD
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):920-8. PubMed ID: 19397667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid combined with intense pulsed light in the treatment of photoaging.
Dover JS; Bhatia AC; Stewart B; Arndt KA
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Oct; 141(10):1247-52. PubMed ID: 16230562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ablative versus non-ablative treatment of perioral rhytides. A randomized controlled trial with long-term blinded clinical evaluations and non-invasive measurements.
Hedelund L; Bjerring P; Egekvist H; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 16392145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light.
Galeckas KJ; Collins M; Ross EV; Uebelhoer NS
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 18318731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facial photo rejuvenation using two different intense pulsed light (IPL) wavelength bands.
Bjerring P; Christiansen K; Troilius A; Dierickx C
Lasers Surg Med; 2004; 34(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 15004823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light: significant improvement and long-lasting results.
Papageorgiou P; Clayton W; Norwood S; Chopra S; Rustin M
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(3):628-32. PubMed ID: 18565174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paring and intense pulsed light versus paring alone for recalcitrant hand and foot warts: a randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome evaluation.
Togsverd-Bo K; Gluud C; Winkel P; Larsen HK; Lomholt HB; Cramers M; Bjerring P; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Feb; 42(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 20166158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intense pulsed light versus advanced fluorescent technology pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a split-face pilot comparison.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 6(10):1024-8. PubMed ID: 17966180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hair removal using a new intense pulsed light source in Chinese patients.
Feng YM; Zhou ZC; Gold MH
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Jun; 11(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 19337941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split treatment of photodamaged skin with KTP 532 nm laser with 10 mm handpiece versus IPL: a cheek-to-cheek comparison.
Butler EG; McClellan SD; Ross EV
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 16142765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
