275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19309696)
1. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
Spoon DB; Rubinshtein R; Psaltis PJ; Sandhu GS; Lennon R; Rihal CS; Lerman A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
Muramatsu T; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Nakatani S; Girasis C; Campos CM; Morel MA; Jonker H; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; García-García HM; Leon MB; Serruys PW; Onuma Y;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter.
Lee JB; Chang SG; Kim SY; Lee YS; Ryu JK; Choi JY; Kim KS; Park JS
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct; 28(7):1627-34. PubMed ID: 22179945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.
Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Huang Z; Reiber JH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21264684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First-in-man evaluation of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) of Terumo: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.
Okamura T; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Geuns RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Schultz C; van der Giessen WJ; Ligthart J; Regar E; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2011 Apr; 6(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 21518674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation.
Slager CJ; Wentzel JJ; Schuurbiers JC; Oomen JA; Kloet J; Krams R; von Birgelen C; van der Giessen WJ; Serruys PW; de Feyter PJ
Circulation; 2000 Aug; 102(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 10920062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
Zasada W; Slezak M; Pociask E; Malinowski KP; Proniewska K; Buszman P; Milewski K; Granada JF; Kaluza GL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 35(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 30796556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Boersma E; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20939040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.
Papafaklis MI; Bourantas CV; Yonetsu T; Vergallo R; Kotsia A; Nakatani S; Lakkas LS; Athanasiou LS; Naka KK; Fotiadis DI; Feldman CL; Stone PH; Serruys PW; Jang IK; Michalis LK
EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24974809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments.
Gradaus R; Mathies K; Breithardt G; Böcker D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jul; 68(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 16770813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries with intravascular ultrasound.
von Birgelen C; Erbel R; Di Mario C; Li W; Prati F; Ge J; Bruining N; Görge G; Slager CJ; Serruys PW
Herz; 1995 Aug; 20(4):277-89. PubMed ID: 7557831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiographic derived endothelial shear stress: a new predictor of atherosclerotic disease progression.
Bourantas CV; Ramasamy A; Karagiannis A; Sakellarios A; Zanchin T; Yamaji K; Ueki Y; Shen X; Fotiadis DI; Michalis LK; Mathur A; Serruys PW; Garcia-Garcia HM; Koskinas K; Torii R; Windecker S; Räber L
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 30020435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of angiographic and IVUS derived coronary geometric reconstructions for evaluation of the association of hemodynamics with coronary artery disease progression.
Timmins LH; Suo J; Eshtehardi P; Molony DS; McDaniel MC; Oshinski JN; Giddens DP; Samady H
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1327-1336. PubMed ID: 27229349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of coronary lumen reconstruction on the estimation of endothelial shear stress: in vivo comparison of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional fusion combining optical coherent tomography.
Kweon J; Kang SJ; Kim YH; Lee JG; Han S; Ha H; Yang DH; Kang JW; Lim TH; Kwon O; Ahn JM; Lee PH; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1134-1141. PubMed ID: 29028985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.
Marwan M; Pflederer T; Schepis T; Seltmann M; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21245696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Muramatsu T; Aben JP; Onuma Y; Soekhradj S; Morel MA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2013 Apr; 8(12):1451-60. PubMed ID: 23680960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
