These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19309753)
41. A biofilm model for prediction of pollutant transformation in sewers. Jiang F; Leung DH; Li S; Chen GH; Okabe S; van Loosdrecht MC Water Res; 2009 Jul; 43(13):3187-98. PubMed ID: 19487008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Converting corn wet-milling effluent into high-value fungal biomass in a biofilm reactor. Jasti N; Khanal SK; Pometto AL; van Leeuwen JH Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Dec; 101(6):1223-33. PubMed ID: 18781693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Biofilm formation and partial biodegradation of polystyrene by the actinomycete Rhodococcus ruber: biodegradation of polystyrene. Mor R; Sivan A Biodegradation; 2008 Nov; 19(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 18401686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Results from the multi-species benchmark problem 3 (BM3) using two-dimensional models. Noguera DR; Picioreanu C Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):169-76. PubMed ID: 15303738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Nitritation performance and biofilm development of co- and counter-diffusion biofilm reactors: modeling and experimental comparison. Wang R; Terada A; Lackner S; Smets BF; Henze M; Xia S; Zhao J Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(10):2699-709. PubMed ID: 19375773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction. Vrouwenvelder JS; Hinrichs C; Van der Meer WG; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC Biofouling; 2009; 25(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 19437193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biofilm productivity and concomitant cell autolysis in a membrane bioreactor. Govender S Biotechnol Lett; 2011 Feb; 33(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 20972820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. One-dimensional mixed-culture biofilm model considering different space occupancies of particulate components. Lee MW; Park JM Water Res; 2007 Nov; 41(19):4317-28. PubMed ID: 17631377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Ultrasonic monitoring of early-stage biofilm growth on polymeric surfaces. Kujundzic E; Fonseca AC; Evans EA; Peterson M; Greenberg AR; Hernandez M J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):458-67. PubMed ID: 17141898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Using bacterial bioluminescence to evaluate the impact of biofilm on porous media hydraulic properties. Bozorg A; Gates ID; Sen A J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Feb; 109():84-92. PubMed ID: 25479429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Numerical experiments for bioclogging in porous media. Ham YJ; Kim SB; Park SJ Environ Technol; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1079-89. PubMed ID: 17970514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparing global sensitivity analysis for a biofilm model for two-step nitrification using the qualitative screening method of Morris or the quantitative variance-based Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST). Brockmann D; Morgenroth E Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):85-93. PubMed ID: 17978436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reaction-diffusion model of nutrient uptake in a biofilm: theory and experiment. Petroff AP; Wu TD; Liang B; Mui J; Guerquin-Kern JL; Vali H; Rothman DH; Bosak T J Theor Biol; 2011 Nov; 289():90-5. PubMed ID: 21840322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Selective imaging of biofilms in porous media by NMR relaxation. Hoskins BC; Fevang L; Majors PD; Sharma MM; Georgiou G J Magn Reson; 1999 Jul; 139(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10388585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Study on the influence of bioclogging on permeability of saturated porous media by experiments and models]. Yang J; Ye SJ; Wu JC Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 May; 32(5):1364-71. PubMed ID: 21780592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]