These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. From risk for trauma to unintentional injury risk: falls--a concept analysis. Nursing Diagnosis Extension and Classification Research Team. Schoenfelder DP; Crowell CM Nurs Diagn; 1999; 10(4):149-57. PubMed ID: 10786555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO. Müller-Staub M; Lunney M; Odenbreit M; Needham I; Lavin MA; van Achterberg T J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1027-37. PubMed ID: 19220614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Scope creep: when nursing practice moves beyond traditional boundaries: an evidence-based example using procedural sedation. Davidson JE; Bloomberg D; Burnell L Crit Care Nurs Q; 2007; 30(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 17579305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cross-mapping the Finnish Classification of Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Interventions and the Oulu Patient Classification. Liljamo P; Kaakinen P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():774-5. PubMed ID: 19592974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Cecile Boisvert: nursing diagnoses have made progress. Interview by Francoise Henin]. Boisvert C Soins; 1992; (563-564):62-3. PubMed ID: 1290108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Processes and methodologies for research validation of nursing diagnoses. Whitley GG Nurs Diagn; 1999; 10(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 10358519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Taxonomic indexing--extending the role of taxonomy. Patterson DJ; Remsen D; Marino WA; Norton C Syst Biol; 2006 Jun; 55(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 16861205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Measuring the outcomes of school nursing practice: showing that school nurses do make a difference. Denehy J J Sch Nurs; 2000 Feb; 16(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 11033670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The translation of NANDA taxonomy I into ICD code. Fitzpatrick JJ Nurs Diagn; 1998; 9(2 Suppl):34-6. PubMed ID: 9987314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Studies about use and application of nursing classifications]. Müller-Staub M Pflege Z; 2009 Jun; 62(6):354-9. PubMed ID: 19555006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. EXTEND: a prototype expert system for teaching nursing diagnosis. Koch B; McGovern J Comput Nurs; 1993; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 8428320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Historical perspective: the National Conference Group for Classification of Nursing Diagnoses (1978, 1980). Gordon M Nurs Diagn; 1998; 9(2 Suppl):27-31. PubMed ID: 9987312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Guidelines for submission of new diagnoses finalized. Nurs Diagn; 1990; 1(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 2268492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Quality of care in occupational health through nursing diagnosis. Glasgow GM AAOHN J; 1990 Mar; 38(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 2317236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Standardizing care. When the intervention is valid]. Serrano Sastre R; Saracíbar Rázquin MI; Carrascal Garchitorena E; Tina Majuelo P; Narvaiza Solís MJ; Sanz Izco M; Díaz Navarlaz MT Rev Enferm; 1997; 20(227-8):23-31. PubMed ID: 9282076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]