These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1931541)

  • 1. The dangers resulting from inaccurate computer-based operative records.
    Knight L; Yardley M; Jones A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1991; 45(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 1931541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a computer-based anaesthetic audit system.
    Lillywhite N; Ward P
    Anaesthesia; 1993 Oct; 48(10):885-6. PubMed ID: 8238831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A standard XML Schema for computerised anaesthetic records.
    Gardner M; Peachey T
    Anaesthesia; 2002 Dec; 57(12):1174-82. PubMed ID: 12437708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement on sedation-related events between a procedural sedation registry and computerized medical records.
    Shaver K; Weiss S; Braude D
    Am J Emerg Med; 2010 Mar; 28(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 20223381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer generated operation notes.
    Currall VA; Chesser TJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():51-5. PubMed ID: 18560067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and completeness of orthopaedic computer audit.
    Coleman NP; Warren PJ; Greenough CG
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Jun; 36(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 1920244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operating theatre lists--accidents waiting to happen?
    Reed MW; Phillips WS
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Nov; 76(6 Suppl):279-80. PubMed ID: 7598398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.
    Whitelaw FG; Nevin SL; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Taylor MW; Watt AH
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Mar; 46(404):181-6. PubMed ID: 8731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of database management system by surgeons to produce operation notes.
    Dale RF; Midwinter MJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1996 Nov; 78(6 Suppl):272-5. PubMed ID: 8944499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Up-to=date view on medical documentation in surgical clinic].
    Kriger AG; Nechipaĭ AM; Fedorov AV; Glushkov PS
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2000; (1):56-60. PubMed ID: 10684200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [IOL and aniseikonia calculation combined with documentation of surgical data and IOL inventory].
    Bastian GO; Hiss P
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Aug; 89(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 1304215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?
    Herbert MA; Prince SL; Williams JL; Magee MJ; Mack MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):1960-4; discussion 1964-5. PubMed ID: 15172246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nursing documentation for communicating and evaluating care.
    Törnvall E; Wilhelmsson S
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2116-24. PubMed ID: 18710374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A method for systematic internal quality assurance in surgery].
    Küchle R; Junginger T
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of information systems for direct surgical patient management].
    Krieglstein CF; Schall R; Runkel M; Herfarth C
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():656-9. PubMed ID: 9574233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a centrally maintained computerized hospital database: comparison with operating room logbooks.
    Pilpel D; Fraser GM; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    Isr J Med Sci; 1993 May; 29(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 8314689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic templates versus dictation for the completion of Mohs micrographic surgery operative notes.
    Cowan DA; Sands MB; Rabizadeh SM; Amos CS; Ford C; Nussbaum R; Stein D; Liegeois NJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 17451582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of quality control methods for medical documentation.
    Stausberg J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():864-8. PubMed ID: 10179791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.