108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19317209)
1. Court invoked 'Res Ipsa' in contaminated needle infection case. Antoniato v. Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 2009-NY-0126.244 (1/20/2009) -NY.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Feb; 49(9):1. PubMed ID: 19317209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NY: Failure to remove surgical packing: "Foreign object" & Res Ipsa not applicable. NY: nurse causes i.v. pole to fall on patient: surgeon not vicariously liable for negligence.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Dec; 37(7):3. PubMed ID: 9256785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hypodermic needle left in patient: Res Ipsa Loquitur issue. Case on point: Dickerson v. Fatehi 484 S.E. 2d 880--VA (1997).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jun; 38(1):4. PubMed ID: 9256794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. NY: laparotomy pad left in patient: O.R. nurse testifies as "expert" witness.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Sep; 37(4):3. PubMed ID: 9295737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur places burden on perioperative personnel.
Zuffoletto JM
AORN J; 1992 Aug; 56(2):342-3. PubMed ID: 1503475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Res ipsa loquitur--putting the health care provider on the hot seat.
McMullen P
Nursingconnections; 1991; 4(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 1876193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NY: Resident discharged patient prematurely: no consultation or authorization by attending. Suljic v. Levey, 2010-30785 (NYMISC) (4/7/2010)-NY.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 May; 50(12):3. PubMed ID: 20560179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Who is responsible for malpractice in the operating room? 1: Tutoring in malpractice law].
Rach S
Pflege Aktuell; 2002 Mar; 56(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 11924063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal case briefs for nurses. AL.: Wrong anesthetic: vicarious liability. N.C.: Incorrect needle count: complications.
Tamelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jun; 30(1):3. PubMed ID: 2748848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Defending negligence claims.
Langslow A
Aust Nurs J; 1999 Apr; 6(9):32-3. PubMed ID: 10568406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal accountability in the operating room.
Furay CJ
Todays OR Nurse; 1989 Jun; 11(6):22-3, 26-8. PubMed ID: 2734816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nurse and the law. More on foreign bodies.
Langslow A
Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jul; 22(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 1530525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recovery room nurse fails to monitor patient. Case in point: Eyoma v. Falco (589 A. 2d 653--NJ 1991).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jul; 32(2):2. PubMed ID: 1876705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The malpractice nightmare. Round table discussion.
Todays OR Nurse; 1990 Feb; 12(2):12-7. PubMed ID: 2305429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical accidents and nurse defendants.
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Jul; 24(2):1. PubMed ID: 6555838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Negligence liability of nonmedical personnel in operating room service and nursing service].
Staats V
Krankenpflege (Frankf); 1985 Mar; 39(3):85-6, 99-102. PubMed ID: 3920443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Blade left in pt.: why didn't nurses notice bladeless scalpel? Ripley v. Lanzer, WA-61952-7-1(9/14/2009)-WA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Sep; 50(4):1. PubMed ID: 19877407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative use of unlicensed assistive personnel. Healthtrust v Cantrell.
Murphy EK
AORN J; 1998 Oct; 68(4):678-81. PubMed ID: 9795722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gauze pad left in pt. during reversal of tubal ligation surgery. Case on point: Houserman v. Garrett, 2004 WL 2829112.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Dec; 45(7):4. PubMed ID: 15675762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Somera case.
Grennan EM
NLN Publ; 1990 Jun; (20-2294):187-91. PubMed ID: 2235378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
