159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19317909)
1. Population based prostate cancer screening in north Mexico reveals a high prevalence of aggressive tumors in detected cases.
Gomez-Guerra LS; Martinez-Fierro ML; Alcantara-Aragon V; Ortiz-Lopez R; Martinez-Villarreal RT; Morales-Rodriguez IB; Garza-Guajardo R; Ponce-Camacho MA; Rojas-Martinez A
BMC Cancer; 2009 Mar; 9():91. PubMed ID: 19317909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate-specific antigen-based early detection of prostate cancer--validation of screening without rectal examination.
Schröder FH; Roobol-Bouts M; Vis AN; van der Kwast T; Kranse R
Urology; 2001 Jan; 57(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 11164149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.
Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between literacy, compliance with prostate cancer screening, and cancer aggressiveness: results from a Brazilian screening study.
Tobias-Machado M; Carvalhal GF; Freitas CH; Reis RB; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Magnabosco W; Vieira RA; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Faria EF;
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 23849582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Free prostate-specific antigen improves prostate cancer detection in a high-risk population of men with a normal total PSA and digitalrectal examination.
Uzzo RG; Pinover WH; Horwitz EM; Parlanti A; Mazzoni S; Raysor S; Mirchandani I; Greenberg RE; Pollack A; Hanks GE; Watkins-Bruner D
Urology; 2003 Apr; 61(4):754-9. PubMed ID: 12670560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the digital rectal examination as diagnostic test for prostate cancer detection in obese patients.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2015; 20(6):1601-5. PubMed ID: 26854458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary prostate cancer prevalence among T1c biopsy-referred men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or = 4.0 ng per milliliter.
Ahyai SA; Graefen M; Steuber T; Haese A; Schlomm T; Walz J; Köllermann J; Briganti A; Zacharias M; Friedrich MG; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Huland H; Chun FK
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):750-7. PubMed ID: 17964070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percent free PSA as an additional measure in a prostate cancer screen.
Miele ME
Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15625982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Schröder FH; van der Maas P; Beemsterboer P; Kruger AB; Hoedemaeker R; Rietbergen J; Kranse R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1817-23. PubMed ID: 9839522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Screening of cancer of the prostate: study in a Spanish population].
Herrero Payo JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Páez Borda A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Moreno Valle JA; Berenguer Sánchez A
Arch Esp Urol; 1996; 49(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 8929102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate cancer.
Candas B; Cusan L; Gomez JL; Diamond P; Suburu RE; Lévesque J; Brousseau G; Bélanger A; Labrie F
Prostate; 2000 Sep; 45(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 10960839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of the finasteride-adjusted Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in a Mexican referral population: a validation study.
Liang Y; Ketchum NS; Louden C; Jimenez-Rios MA; Thompson IM; Camarena-Reynoso HR
Urol Int; 2012; 89(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 22626812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should men with serum prostate-specific antigen < or =4 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination undergo a prostate biopsy? A literature review.
Pepe P; Panella P; D'Arrigo L; Savoca F; Pennisi M; Aragona F
Oncology; 2006; 70(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 16601365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.
Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA
Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen abnormalities at the time of prostate biopsy and biopsy outcomes, 1980 to 1997.
Roberts RO; Bergstralh EJ; Lieber MM; Jacobsen SJ
Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):817-22. PubMed ID: 11068309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less.
Yamamoto T; Ito K; Ohi M; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H
Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 11744475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer screening among elderly men in Brazil: should we diagnose or not?
Mori RR; Faria EF; Mauad EC; Rodrigues AA; Dos Reis RB
Int Braz J Urol; 2020; 46(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 31851456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
