BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19317909)

  • 21. Histological inflammation and risk of subsequent prostate cancer among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
    Yli-Hemminki TH; Laurila M; Auvinen A; Määttänen L; Huhtala H; Tammela TL; Kujala PM
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 23746332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of usefulness of prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in an unscreened population:experience in a Nigerian teaching hospital.
    Ojewola RW; Tijani KH; Jeje EA; Ogunjimi MA; Anunobi CC; Adesanya AO
    West Afr J Med; 2013; 32(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23613288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume.
    Chiu PK; Roobol MJ; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yip SY; Hou SM; Bangma CH; Ng CF
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1631-7. PubMed ID: 27349564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Association between family history of prostate cancer and positive biopsies in a Brazilian screening program.
    Muller RL; Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; Reis RB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Freedland SJ
    World J Urol; 2013 Oct; 31(5):1273-8. PubMed ID: 22820620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH
    Prostate; 2007 Feb; 67(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17044079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The digital rectal examination (DRE) remains important - outcomes from a contemporary cohort of men undergoing an initial 12-18 core prostate needle biopsy.
    Palmerola R; Smith P; Elliot V; Reese CT; Mahon FB; Harpster LE; Icitovic N; Raman JD
    Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6542-7. PubMed ID: 23228289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; van den Bergh RC; Wolters T; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 18406045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of Digital Rectal Examination as an Adjunct to Prostate Specific Antigen in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Halpern JA; Oromendia C; Shoag JE; Mittal S; Cosiano MF; Ballman KV; Vickers AJ; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):947-953. PubMed ID: 29061540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic value of percent free prostate-specific antigen: retrospective analysis of a population-based screening study with emphasis on men with PSA levels less than 3.0 ng/mL.
    Törnblom M; Norming U; Adolfsson J; Becker C; Abrahamsson PA; Lilja H; Gustafsson O
    Urology; 1999 May; 53(5):945-50. PubMed ID: 10223488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy.
    Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Relationship between screening by stratifying cases into groups on prostate specific antigen level and the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound guided systematic sextant prostate biopsy].
    Cao XL; Gao JP; Han G; Tang J; Hong BF
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):372-5. PubMed ID: 16638344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normal range prostate-specific antigen versus age-specific prostate-specific antigen in screening prostate adenocarcinoma.
    el-Galley RE; Petros JA; Sanders WH; Keane TE; Galloway NT; Cooner WH; Graham SD
    Urology; 1995 Aug; 46(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 7542822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.
    Chiu PK; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yee CH; Chan ES; Hou SM; Ng CF
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Sep; 57(5):336-42. PubMed ID: 27617315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Utility of digital rectal examination, serum prostate specific antigen, and transrectal ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a developing country perspective.
    Kash DP; Lal M; Hashmi AH; Mubarak M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(7):3087-91. PubMed ID: 24815452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
    Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. American Cancer Society--National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Results from multiple examinations using transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, and prostate specific antigen.
    Mettlin C; Murphy GP; Ray P; Shanberg A; Toi A; Chesley A; Babaian R; Badalament R; Kane RA; Lee F
    Cancer; 1993 Feb; 71(3 Suppl):891-8. PubMed ID: 7679042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
    Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen].
    Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M
    Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prevalence of prostate cancer at different levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and different free: total PSA ratios in a consecutive series of men referred for prostate biopsies.
    Rydén L; Egevad L; Ekman P; Hellström M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 17763221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The prognostic value of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in patients over 70 years old with a prostate specific Antigen (PSA) level ≤ 15 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination: a 10-year prospective follow-up study of 427 consecutive patients.
    Mohamed ZK; Dominguez-Escrig J; Vasdev N; Bharathan B; Greene D
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 22591749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.