107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1931857)
1. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal.
Rushton R; Cohen AM; Linney AD
Br J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 18(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 1931857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects.
Hussels W; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 3479897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
Del Santo M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What skeletal and dental characteristics do TMD patients have in common?
Phillips JT
Funct Orthod; 2007; 24(1):24-6, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 17402385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Wits" appraisal in southern Chinese children.
So LL; Davis PJ; King NM
Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2316903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
Chandra PK; Godfrey K
Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometric influence of the sagittal and vertical apical base relationship on the ANB angle.
Sadat-Khonsari R; Dathe H; Knösel M; Hahn W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O
J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19322533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displacement in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities.
Jung WS; Kim H; Jeon DM; Mah SJ; Ahn SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1108-15. PubMed ID: 23618835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Zamora N; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jul; 18(4):e725-32. PubMed ID: 23722136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
