354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19318585)
1. Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method.
Murakami R; Hirai T; Sugahara T; Fukuoka H; Toya R; Nishimura S; Kitajima M; Okuda T; Nakamura H; Oya N; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):838-45. PubMed ID: 19318585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis.
Higano S; Yun X; Kumabe T; Watanabe M; Mugikura S; Umetsu A; Sato A; Yamada T; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):839-46. PubMed ID: 17032910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with enhancement degree and histologic grade.
Woo S; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):758-67. PubMed ID: 24475811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Huisman HJ; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Scheenen T; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 21502392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.
Server A; Kulle B; Maehlen J; Josefsen R; Schellhorn T; Kumar T; Langberg CW; Nakstad PH
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 19449234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of pilocytic astrocytomas: usefulness of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for differentiation from high-grade gliomas.
Murakami R; Hirai T; Kitajima M; Fukuoka H; Toya R; Nakamura H; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 18415792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal cell carcinoma: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for subtype differentiation at 3.0 T.
Wang H; Cheng L; Zhang X; Wang D; Guo A; Gao Y; Ye H
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 20713607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of peritumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastatic lesions.
Lee EJ; terBrugge K; Mikulis D; Choi DS; Bae JM; Lee SK; Moon SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21178049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging--a preliminary experience.
Zhang J; Tehrani YM; Wang L; Ishill NM; Schwartz LH; Hricak H
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):458-64. PubMed ID: 18430878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Taouli B; Thakur RK; Mannelli L; Babb JS; Kim S; Hecht EM; Lee VS; Israel GM
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):398-407. PubMed ID: 19276322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 24316663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apparent diffusion coefficients in evaluation of pediatric brain tumors.
Tuntiyatorn L; Nantawas B; Sirachainan N; Larbcharoensub N; Visudtibhan A; Hongeng S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Feb; 96(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 23936983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging.
Parikh T; Drew SJ; Lee VS; Wong S; Hecht EM; Babb JS; Taouli B
Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):812-22. PubMed ID: 18223123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Water diffusivity: comparison of primary CNS lymphoma and astrocytic tumor infiltrating the corpus callosum.
Horger M; Fenchel M; Nägele T; Moehle R; Claussen CD; Beschorner R; Ernemann U
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1384-7. PubMed ID: 19843757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade.
Rosenkrantz AB; Niver BE; Fitzgerald EF; Babb JS; Chandarana H; Melamed J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):W344-51. PubMed ID: 20966299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Malignant hepatic tumors: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH; Park SH; Kim JK; Park B; Kim N; Lee MG
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 20501719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Iima M; Le Bihan D; Okumura R; Okada T; Fujimoto K; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Fujimoto M; Sakashita H; Togashi K
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 21633054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging.
Yamasaki F; Kurisu K; Satoh K; Arita K; Sugiyama K; Ohtaki M; Takaba J; Tominaga A; Hanaya R; Yoshioka H; Hama S; Ito Y; Kajiwara Y; Yahara K; Saito T; Thohar MA
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):985-91. PubMed ID: 15833979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
