These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19318704)

  • 1. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
    Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
    Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Gerris J; De Sutter P; De Neubourg D; Van Royen E; Vander Elst J; Mangelschots K; Vercruyssen M; Kok P; Elseviers M; Annemans L; Pauwels P; Dhont M
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 14990547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles.
    van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 15550492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
    Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.
    Fiddelers AA; van Montfoort AP; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Dunselman GA; Janssen JM; Severens JL; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2090-7. PubMed ID: 16613886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles.
    Martikainen H; Orava M; Lakkakorpi J; Tuomivaara L
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1364-6. PubMed ID: 15105390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers.
    Fauque P; Jouannet P; Davy C; Guibert J; Viallon V; Epelboin S; Kunstmann JM; Patrat C
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):927-35. PubMed ID: 19446806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
    Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M
    Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
    Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program.
    Hernandez Torres E; Navarro-Espigares JL; Clavero A; López-Regalado M; Camacho-Ballesta JA; Onieva-García M; Martínez L; Castilla JA
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 25557244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of seven IVF strategies: results of a Markov decision-analytic model.
    Fiddelers AA; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP; Land JA; Janssen JM; Evers JL; Severens JL
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1648-55. PubMed ID: 19318703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to demonstrate that eSET does not compromise the likelihood of having a baby?
    Bechoua S; Astruc K; Thouvenot S; Girod S; Chiron A; Jimenez C; Sagot P
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3073-81. PubMed ID: 19752013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human chorionic gonadotropin levels in early IVF/ICSI pregnancies are higher in singletons after single embryo transfer compared with singletons after double embryo transfer.
    Delbaere I; Vansteelandt S; Gerris J; De Sutter P; De Bacquer D; Temmerman M
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Nov; 23(11):2421-6. PubMed ID: 18664472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience].
    Leniaud L; Poncelet C; Porcher R; Martin-Pont B; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Wolf JP; Sifer C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Feb; 36(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 18255330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF.
    Fiddelers AA; Severens JL; Dirksen CD; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod Update; 2007; 13(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17099208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Kjellberg AT; Carlsson P; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):210-6. PubMed ID: 16172148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.
    van Heesch MM; van Asselt AD; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 27907897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.