BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

811 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19318704)

  • 21. Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women.
    Kalu E; Thum MY; Abdalla H
    BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18518874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
    Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Synchronization between embryo development and endometrium is a contributing factor for rescue ICSI outcome.
    Ming L; Liu P; Qiao J; Lian Y; Zheng X; Ren X; Huang J; Wu Y
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 May; 24(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 22480904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates.
    van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Land JA; Dirksen CD; Severens JL; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1669-74. PubMed ID: 17416915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer.
    López-Regalado ML; Clavero A; Gonzalvo MC; Serrano M; Martínez L; Mozas J; Rodríguez-Serrano F; Fontes J; Castilla JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():192-8. PubMed ID: 24798072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Janssen JM; Derhaag JG; Dirksen CD; Dunselman GA; Land JA; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Feb; 21(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 16253973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
    Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].
    Ertzeid G; Fedorcsak P; Abyholm T; Tanbo T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(23):3101-2. PubMed ID: 17160114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcome and feasibility of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy for the first and second IVF/ICSI attempts.
    Gremeau AS; Brugnon F; Bouraoui Z; Pekrishvili R; Janny L; Pouly JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jan; 160(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 22178171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer.
    Hydén-Granskog C; Unkila-Kallio L; Halttunen M; Tiitinen A
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Oct; 20(10):2935-8. PubMed ID: 15980000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint.
    Polinder S; Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Habbema JD; Fauser BJ; Eijkemans MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Feb; 23(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 18033807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.
    Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Outcome of elective single or double embryo transfer in first and second IVF/ICSI cycles].
    Gremeau AS; Brugnon F; Bouraoui Z; Peikhrishvili R; Janny L; Pouly JL
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Feb; 39(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 21316284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: Should it be the rule?
    Clua E; Tur R; Coroleu B; Boada M; Rodríguez I; Barri PN; Veiga A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 23069742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
    El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lukassen HG; Braat DD; Wetzels AM; Zielhuis GA; Adang EM; Scheenjes E; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Mar; 20(3):702-8. PubMed ID: 15618254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strategies in England.
    Dixon S; Faghih Nasiri F; Ledger WL; Lenton EA; Duenas A; Sutcliffe P; Chilcott JB
    BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 18355368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization.
    Thurin A; Hausken J; Hillensjö T; Jablonowska B; Pinborg A; Strandell A; Bergh C
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Dec; 351(23):2392-402. PubMed ID: 15575055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
    Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction].
    Song WY; Sun YP; Jin HX; Xin ZM; Su YC; Guo YH; Chen ZJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 45(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 21029612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.