These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19319748)

  • 21. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.
    Striemer CL; Russell K; Nath P
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27206500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Viewing of figurative paintings affects pseudoneglect as measured by line bisection.
    Ciricugno A; Ferrari C; Rusconi ML; Cattaneo Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3795-3803. PubMed ID: 33025464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Listening to white noise counteracts visual and haptic pseudoneglect.
    Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Vecchi T; Vallar G
    Perception; 2012; 41(11):1395-8. PubMed ID: 23513624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prism adaptation in the healthy brain: the shift in line bisection judgments is long lasting and fluctuates.
    Schintu S; Pisella L; Jacobs S; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():165-70. PubMed ID: 24291512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Signatures of functional visuospatial asymmetries in early infancy.
    Nava E; de Hevia MD; Bulf H; Macchi Cassia V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105326. PubMed ID: 34883319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.
    Valadao DF; Hurwitz M; Danckert J
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 207(3-4):157-64. PubMed ID: 20953590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Furukawa T; Tsukagoshi H
    Brain; 1989 Dec; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-analysis of the visuospatial aftereffects of prism adaptation, with two novel experiments.
    McIntosh RD; Brown BMA; Young L
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():256-273. PubMed ID: 30530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radial bisection of words and lines in right-brain-damaged patients with spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Girelli L; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2017 Sep; 11(3):396-413. PubMed ID: 26611497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A registered re-examination of the effects of leftward prism adaptation on landmark judgements in healthy people.
    McIntosh RD; Ten Brink AF; Mitchell AG; Jones H; Peng N; Thye M; Bultitude JH
    Cortex; 2023 Jan; 158():139-157. PubMed ID: 36529083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Extra-powerful on the visuo-perceptual space, but variable on the number space: Different effects of optokinetic stimulation in neglect patients.
    Pitteri M; Kerkhoff G; Keller I; Meneghello F; Priftis K
    J Neuropsychol; 2015 Sep; 9(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 25145402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.
    Bultitude JH; Aimola Davies AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Grant A; Harvey M
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2014; 6():113. PubMed ID: 24959142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The asymmetrical effect of leftward and rightward prisms on intact visuospatial cognition.
    Schintu S; Patané I; Caldano M; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Cortex; 2017 Dec; 97():23-31. PubMed ID: 29078083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.