These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19319837)

  • 41. Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System.
    Helm RK; Reyna VF; Franz AA; Novick RZ; Dincin S; Cort AE
    Psychol Crime Law; 2018; 24(9):915-934. PubMed ID: 30745792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pathological gambling and criminal responsibility.
    Rachlin S; Halpern AL; Portnow SL
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Jan; 31(1):235-40. PubMed ID: 3944564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Commentary: evidence-based practice and forensic psychiatry.
    Schneider RD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 20018998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Use of posttraumatic stress disorder to support an insanity defense.
    Appelbaum PS; Jick RZ; Grisso T; Givelber D; Silver E; Steadman HJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Feb; 150(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 8422072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. What does recent neuroscience tell us about criminal responsibility?
    Maoz U; Yaffe G
    J Law Biosci; 2016 Apr; 3(1):120-139. PubMed ID: 27774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
    Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Opportunities, threats and limitations of neuroscience data in forensic psychiatric evaluation.
    Casartelli L; Chiamulera C
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2013 Sep; 26(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 23842085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The legal self: executive processes and legal theory.
    Hirstein W; Sifferd K
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Mar; 20(1):156-71. PubMed ID: 21055971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Neurophilosophical perspectives of neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry-giving way to a paradigm shift?
    Witzel J; Walter M; Bogerts B; Northoff G
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):113-30. PubMed ID: 18327827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mental impairment, moral understanding and criminal responsibility: psychopathy and the purposes of punishment.
    Fine C; Kennett J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2004; 27(5):425-43. PubMed ID: 15337361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Criminal responsibility, "fleeting" states of mental impairment, and the power of self-control.
    McSherry B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2004; 27(5):445-57. PubMed ID: 15337362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system.
    Sapolsky RM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Nov; 359(1451):1787-96. PubMed ID: 15590619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Factors associated with experts' opinions regarding criminal responsibility in The Netherlands.
    Barendregt M; Muller E; Nijman H; de Beurs E
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):619-31. PubMed ID: 18788082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The brain-disordered defendant: neuroscience and legal insanity in the twenty-first century.
    Redding RE
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 56(1):51-127. PubMed ID: 17051689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Criminal law as it pertains to 'mentally incompetent defendants': a McNaughton rule in the light of cognitive neuroscience.
    Bennett A O M
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2009 Apr; 43(4):289-99. PubMed ID: 19296283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Recent neuroimaging techniques in mild traumatic brain injury.
    Belanger HG; Vanderploeg RD; Curtiss G; Warden DL
    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2007; 19(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 17308222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The detection of malingering in criminal forensic groups: MMPI validity scales.
    Wasyliw OE; Grossman LS; Haywood TW; Cavanaugh JL
    J Pers Assess; 1988; 52(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3404393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.