These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19321977)

  • 1. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses.
    Roszkowska AM; De Grazia L; Cirone M; Ferreri G
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 19321977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.
    Unterlauft JD; Schädle N; Kasper K; Klink T; Geerling G
    Cornea; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 21716097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Sadigh AL; Fouladi RF; Hashemi H; Beheshtnejad AH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 22940796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Mele L; Carnevale UA; Irregolare C; Lanza A; Femiano F; Bifani M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 26481062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.
    Pache M; Wilmsmeyer S; Lautebach S; Funk J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 243(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 15756572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of corneal thickness changes during active uveitis on Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Heinz C; Taneri S; Roesel M; Heiligenhaus A
    Ophthalmic Res; 2012; 48(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22354174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of Tono-pachymetry for Measuring Corrected Intraocular Pressure in Non-surgical and Post-photorefractive Keratectomy Eyes.
    Hahn IK; Kim JY; Kim MJ; Tchah H; Moon CH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 28243023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals.
    Ito K; Tawara A; Kubota T; Harada Y
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21173706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
    Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
    Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
    J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.