45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19321992)
1. Comparison between a laser fluorescence device and visual examination in the detection of occlusal caries in children.
Kouchaji C
Saudi Dent J; 2012 Jul; 24(3-4):169-74. PubMed ID: 23960547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of Near-Infrared Technology in the Clinical Detection of Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review.
Elsawaf AE; Deri AYA; Armanious PS; Khasawneh AM; AlKhaja AM; Yasin AR; Al-Rawi NH; Kawas SA; Shetty SR
Eur J Dent; 2024 Feb; 18(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 36870328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of Visual-Tactile Examination and DIAGNOdent Pen in Detecting Early Enamel Caries and Its Remineralisation: An In Vitro Study.
Rashid MF; Karobari MI; Halim MS; Noorani TY
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1263750. PubMed ID: 35059458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.
Macey R; Walsh T; Riley P; Glenny AM; Worthington HV; Fee PA; Clarkson JE; Ricketts D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 12(12):CD013811. PubMed ID: 33319353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined Near-Infrarred Light Transillumination and Direct Digital Radiography Increases Diagnostic In Approximal Caries.
Melo M; Pascual A; Camps I; Ata-Ali F; Ata-Ali J
Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14224. PubMed ID: 31578410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Caries diagnosis using light fluorescence devices in comparison with traditional visual and tactile evaluation: a prospective study in 152 patients.
Melo M; Pascual A; Camps I; Del Campo Á; Ata-Ali J
Odontology; 2017 Jul; 105(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 27655625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo study of different methods for diagnosing pit and fissure caries.
Melo M; Pascual A; Camps I; Del Campo Á
J Clin Exp Dent; 2015 Jul; 7(3):e387-91. PubMed ID: 26330935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cut off values of laser fluorescence for different storage methods at different time intervals in comparison to frozen condition: A 1 year in vitro study.
Kaul R; Kaul V; Farooq R; Wazir ND; Khateeb SU; Malik AH; Masoodi AA
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Mar; 17(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 24778506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kurt H; Kolsuz E; Öztaş B; Tatar I; Çelik HH
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):804-13. PubMed ID: 21116675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Caries Detection Methods Based on Changes in Optical Properties between Healthy and Carious Tissue.
Karlsson L
Int J Dent; 2010; 2010():270729. PubMed ID: 20454579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Lasers in dentistry 2. Diagnosis of dental caries with lasers].
Verdonschot EH; van der Veen MH
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Apr; 109(4):122-6. PubMed ID: 11982208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laser fluorescence of caries detection in permanent teeth in vitro: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rosa MI; Schambeck VS; Dondossola ER; Alexandre MC; Tuon L; Grande AJ; Hugo F
J Evid Based Med; 2016 Nov; 9(4):213-224. PubMed ID: 27792279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of laser fluorescence for detection of occlusal dentinal caries lesions in permanent molars: an in vivo study with total validation of the sample.
Abalos C; Herrera M; Jiménez-Planas A; Llamas R
Caries Res; 2009; 43(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 19321992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of laser fluorescence for the detection of enamel caries in non-cavitated occlusal surfaces: clinical study with total validation of the sample.
Abalos C; Mendoza A; Jimenez-Planas A; Guerrero E; Chaparro A; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2012 Feb; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 22558692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different DIAGNOdent cut-off limits for in vivo detection of occlusal caries.
Heinrich-Weltzien R; Kühnisch J; Oehme T; Ziehe A; Stösser L; García-Godoy F
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):672-80. PubMed ID: 14653279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
