215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19323201)
1. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marine protected area networks in California, USA.
Botsford LW; White JW; Carr MH; Caselle JE
Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():205-51. PubMed ID: 25358301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.
Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C
Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating larval dispersal into MPA design for both conservation and fisheries.
Krueck NC; Ahmadia GN; Green A; Jones GP; Possingham HP; Riginos C; Treml EA; Mumby PJ
Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):925-941. PubMed ID: 28039952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of dispersal patterns on marine reserves: does the tail wag the dog?
Lockwood DR; Hastings A; Botsford LW
Theor Popul Biol; 2002 May; 61(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 12027616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system.
Roberts KE; Cook CN; Beher J; Treml EA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):699-710. PubMed ID: 32623761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Larval dispersal connects fish populations in a network of marine protected areas.
Planes S; Jones GP; Thorrold SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Apr; 106(14):5693-7. PubMed ID: 19307588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low connectivity between Mediterranean marine protected areas: a biophysical modeling approach for the dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus.
Andrello M; Mouillot D; Beuvier J; Albouy C; Thuiller W; Manel S
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68564. PubMed ID: 23861917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation in responses of fishes across multiple reserves within a network of marine protected areas in temperate waters.
Starr RM; Wendt DE; Barnes CL; Marks CI; Malone D; Waltz G; Schmidt KT; Chiu J; Launer AL; Hall NC; Yochum N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118502. PubMed ID: 25760856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design.
Green AL; Maypa AP; Almany GR; Rhodes KL; Weeks R; Abesamis RA; Gleason MG; Mumby PJ; White AT
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Nov; 90(4):1215-47. PubMed ID: 25423947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dispersal per recruit: an efficient method for assessing sustainability in marine reserve networks.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2006 Dec; 16(6):2248-63. PubMed ID: 17205902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marine reserve networks for species that move within a home range.
Moffitt EA; Botsford LW; Kaplan DM; O'Farrell MR
Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1835-47. PubMed ID: 19831073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status.
White JW; Botsford LW; Moffitt EA; Fischer DT
Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1523-41. PubMed ID: 20945757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.
Weeks R; Russ GR; Alcala AC; White AT
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 19843129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs.
Tetreault I; Ambrose RF
Ecol Appl; 2007 Dec; 17(8):2251-67. PubMed ID: 18213966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of fish movement assumptions on the design of a marine protected area to protect an overfished stock.
Cornejo-Donoso J; Einarsson B; Birnir B; Gaines SD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186309. PubMed ID: 29023580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detecting larval export from marine reserves.
Pelc RA; Warner RR; Gaines SD; Paris CB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18266-71. PubMed ID: 20181570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence that spillover from Marine Protected Areas benefits the spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) fishery in southern California.
Lenihan HS; Gallagher JP; Peters JR; Stier AC; Hofmeister JKK; Reed DC
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2663. PubMed ID: 33514853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
