These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1932330)

  • 1. A feasibility study of organised cervical screening in southern New Zealand.
    Cox B; Skegg DC; Paul C; Smeijers J
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Sep; 15(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 1932330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
    Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Campaign for cervical cancer screening with vaginal smears in women aged 50-69 years in Isère (France). Results of the first round (January 1991-June 1993)].
    Garnier A; Exbrayat C; Bolla M; Marron J; Winckel P; Billette de Villemeur A
    Bull Cancer; 1997 Aug; 84(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 9339183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
    Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
    Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some aspects of cervical screening in southern New Zealand; the situation before implementation of the national cervical cancer prevention programme.
    Chang AR
    Cytopathology; 1993; 4(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 8485313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
    Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the coverage of screening for cancer of the cervix be improved using the Electoral Register? A pilot study.
    Cook GA; Wald NJ
    Cancer Lett; 1985 Sep; 28(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 4053000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical screening.
    Ponter E; McSherry A
    N Z Med J; 1994 Nov; 107(990):494-5. PubMed ID: 7970371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population-based organized cervical cancer screening pilot program in France.
    Hamers FF; Duport N; Beltzer N
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28362653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How not to organise a cervical screening programme.
    Skegg DC
    N Z Med J; 1989 Oct; 102(877):527-8. PubMed ID: 2797586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cervical cancer screening campaign in Doubs: evaluation of the first three years of the pilot program].
    Gautier CP; Monnet E; Meslans Y
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():37-43. PubMed ID: 10989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems of cervical cancer screening programmes.
    Rang EH; Tod ED
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Jun; 38(311):267-9. PubMed ID: 3255814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activity level and process indicators of organised programmes for cervical cancer screening in Italy.
    Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):27-40. PubMed ID: 16937844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasons for non-attendance for computer-managed cervical screening: pilot interviews.
    Elkind AK; Haran D; Eardley A; Spencer B
    Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 3227371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recommendations for cervical screening 1997. Members of the Working Party on Cervical Screening.
    N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1062):94-8. PubMed ID: 9577460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction of spontaneous and organised screening for cervical cancer in Turin, Italy.
    Ronco G; Segnan N; Giordano L; Pilutti S; Senore C; Ponti A; Volante R
    Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1262-7. PubMed ID: 9301453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
    Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.