These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19323349)

  • 1. Cochlear implants and FM systems.
    Jerger J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Sep; 19(8):584. PubMed ID: 19323349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing the benefit of sound processors coupled to personal FM systems.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Sep; 19(8):585-94. PubMed ID: 19323350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; Heldner B; Mülder H; Ward E; Vincent B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):409-21. PubMed ID: 19928395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listening preference for child-directed speech versus nonspeech stimuli in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants after cochlear implantation.
    Segal O; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):358-72. PubMed ID: 21512353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Adunka MC; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1049-54. PubMed ID: 20351607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Help for the hearing-impaired. Early evaluation, advanced technology, improved management.
    Wiet RJ
    Postgrad Med; 1988 Nov; 84(6):93-6, 101-3. PubMed ID: 3186561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Users' perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Fournier P; Séguin C; Armstrong S; Chénier J; Schramm D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20053156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Report from the Third International Conference: A sound foundation through early amplification--Chicago 4-6.11.2004].
    Obrebowski A; Lachowska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(3):479-81. PubMed ID: 16117415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of FM amplification instruments for infants and preschool children with hearing impairment. Committee on Amplification for the Hearing Impaired American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1991 Mar; (5):1-2. PubMed ID: 1673599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Report from the Fourth International Conference: A sound foundation through early amplification--Chicago 6-8 .12.2007].
    Obrebowski A; Wojnowski W
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(2):233-5. PubMed ID: 18637454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation (FM) receivers to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Romine D; Musgrave E; Momin S; Huynh C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):927-40. PubMed ID: 24384079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implant success: producing the rising tide.
    House WF
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):547-54. PubMed ID: 8588659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The report from the 2nd International Conference "A sound foundation through early amplification." Chicago, November 8-10, 2001].
    Obrebowski A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2002; 56(2):275-6. PubMed ID: 12094661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Recognition Outcomes After Cochlear Reimplantation Surgery.
    Reis M; Boisvert I; Looi V; da Cruz M
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706398. PubMed ID: 28752810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The coding of vowel identity by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Smith L; Smith M; Parkin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3428-31. PubMed ID: 1474234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants.
    Loizou PC
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(3):34-46. PubMed ID: 10337562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Owens E; Telleen CC
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1981 Mar; 107(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 6894086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.